Mmastodon TechnologyTechnology first seen 9 h ago, last 9 h ago, peak #3
Artist's facial recognition work renews consent debate
Original: "Is it possible to consent to have something that you did today used in the distant future in ways that you could not im
Artist Trevor Paglen's facial recognition project, featured at Fotofocus and covered by CNN, has sparked debate about whether people can meaningfully consent to their images or actions being reused far in the future by technologies that do not yet exist. Commenters are asking how individuals retroactively become part of systems built long after their data was created, and what that means for privacy and consent norms.
Why now: The CNN piece on Paglen's facial recognition work has prompted renewed discussion of data consent and future technologies.
Evidence
- "Is it possible to consent to have something that you did today used in the distant future in ways that you could not imagine? We retroactively become a part of systems that didn’t exist." https://www. cnn.com/2026/10/01/style/trevo r-paglen-artist-facial-recognition-fotofocus… · stefan@stefanbohacek.online · 3
API: https://socialmediatrends-api.osmike.com/v1/trends/785468