Mmastodon TechnologySoftware first seen 19 h ago, last 16 h ago, peak #9
Approval stuck to tasks, not code, creates AI workflow gaps
Original: A reviewer approves a change. An agent then makes another edit. The task still shows “approved.” That is an easy workflo
A common workflow flaw is drawing attention: when a reviewer approves a change, an AI coding agent can make further edits while the task still displays as approved. The problem arises because approval is attached to the task rather than to a specific delivery. Commenters argue a solid review process should clearly define what was approved, at which point, and whether later edits require re-review.
Why now: AI coding agents making unsupervised post-approval edits is a timely concern for software teams adopting agentic tools.
AI coding agentscode review workflows
Evidence
- A reviewer approves a change. An agent then makes another edit. The task still shows “approved.” That is an easy workflow mistake to make when approval belongs to a task rather than a particular delivery. A practical review process should answer three questions: what was… · hackaday@www.urbanmind.net · 4
API: https://socialmediatrends-api.osmike.com/v1/trends/606716