technology regulation

Google has filed an appeal against European Union regulatory requests that would require it to open up Android to rival AI assistants and share search data with competitors. The case adds to Google's long-running battles with EU antitrust authorities, and is being closely watched as regulators across Europe push to curb the power of large technology platforms in emerging AI markets.

Leading figures in the technology industry have appealed to the United Nations, asking global institutions to establish oversight of the artificial intelligence tools they helped build. The message, discussed around a UN Security Council session on AI, frames regulation as necessary for humanity's safety. Commenters are debating whether creators of a technology calling for its own control is a genuine warning or an attempt to shape the rules in their favour.

Executives from Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning that advanced artificial intelligence systems could endanger humanity, while simultaneously pushing to influence how the technology is governed. Commentators are asking what the companies stand to gain from sounding the alarm, with critics suggesting safety messaging doubles as a bid for regulatory influence and market positioning in an increasingly AI-fatigued public debate.

The chief executive of Anthropic, one of the leading AI companies, is calling for stronger regulation of artificial intelligence. In an exclusive interview, he argues that rapid advances in AI systems require clearer rules and oversight from governments. The intervention is notable because it comes from inside the industry, with an AI lab leader backing external checks rather than resisting them.

Leading figures from the artificial intelligence industry are set to meet President Trump at the White House for discussions on the technology's future. The meeting comes as prominent voices in AI have issued stark warnings about potential risks posed by increasingly powerful systems. Details of the agenda and who will attend have not been confirmed, but the talks are expected to cover regulation, safety and American competitiveness in the sector.

Ireland's Data Protection Commission has fined Google €403 million for breaching the EU's General Data Protection Regulation, according to the Irish Times. The penalty from Google's lead European regulator ranks among the larger GDPR fines issued to a major technology company, and the ruling is likely to fuel ongoing debate about how EU watchdogs police the data practices of large US platforms.

An artificial intelligence startup is calling on Europe to embrace a more optimistic outlook on AI technology, even as concerns about safety and potential risks continue to grow. The company argues that European regulators and the public should not let fear hold back innovation, sparking debate about whether Europe can balance technological progress with adequate safeguards for citizens.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, argues in an interview with Le Monde that artificial intelligence is ultimately just software and can be controlled. His comments push back on fears of uncontrollable AI systems, positioning Mistral's approach as one of manageable, governable technology. The remarks are drawing attention among tech industry observers and fueling debate over AI regulation and safety.

Speaker Mike Johnson is set to join Donald Trump for meetings with leading technology executives focused on the risks posed by artificial intelligence. The talks come as Washington weighs how to regulate fast-moving AI development while keeping the US competitive, and they signal that AI policy is moving up the agenda for lawmakers and industry leaders alike.

US House Speaker Mike Johnson says President Trump's meeting with technology chief executives will focus on finding the right balance on artificial intelligence. The discussion is expected to weigh innovation and industry growth against regulation and safety concerns. The meeting brings the Trump administration face to face with leading AI companies as Washington shapes its approach to governing the fast-moving technology.

Executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta are set to attend a meeting at the White House to discuss artificial intelligence policy. The gathering brings together the leaders of the biggest AI developers with US government officials, underscoring Washington's growing focus on regulating and managing the risks of rapidly advancing AI technology.

Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning about the risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence while pushing to influence how the technology will be regulated and controlled. The two leading AI firms are framing safety as a central concern even as they compete to develop increasingly powerful systems, prompting debate over whether companies building AI should be the ones setting the rules for its oversight.

US lawmakers are reportedly struggling to craft policies that keep up with the rapid spread of artificial intelligence, with one account describing the challenge as something that 'dumbfounds us all'. The story, circulated by several US outlets, highlights Congress's difficulty in regulating technology that is reshaping industries faster than legislation can be written. No specific bill or lawmaker is named in the available coverage.

Mistral's chief executive has argued that the American debate over AI safety serves to disguise negligence by competitors, suggesting that warnings about risks are being used as a competitive tool rather than a genuine concern. The remarks add to ongoing tensions between European and US AI companies over regulation and how rapidly the technology should be deployed.

US lawmakers are reviewing a series of proposals aimed at securing artificial intelligence systems and protecting them from misuse. The measures under consideration in Congress would address AI-related security risks, reflecting growing legislative attention to how rapidly evolving AI technology could affect national security and critical infrastructure. Details of the individual proposals and their prospects remain limited so far.

Pope Leo has publicly dismissed suggestions that worries about the risks of artificial intelligence are exaggerated, saying such concerns are not 'fake news'. The remarks add the Vatican's moral weight to the global debate over AI safety, reinforcing calls from scientists and regulators for serious attention to the technology's potential harms and for safeguards in its development.

Anthropic says artificial intelligence could change the world on a scale greater than electricity and the internet. The AI company's assessment underscores the transformative potential it sees in the technology, a comparison that has drawn attention as governments and industries debate how quickly AI should be developed and regulated.

President Trump is set to hold meetings with artificial intelligence executives and government officials, according to USA Today. The talks come amid growing public and political concern over the rapid development of AI, including its impact on jobs, security and misinformation. The meetings signal the White House is engaging directly with industry leaders on how the technology should be regulated and deployed.

Pope Leo has said that warnings about catastrophic or doomsday scenarios involving artificial intelligence should be taken seriously, and are not 'fake news'. Speaking on the risks posed by rapidly advancing AI technology, the pontiff signalled that concerns about its potential harms are legitimate rather than alarmist. His remarks add the Vatican's voice to a growing global debate among governments, tech firms and researchers over how to regulate and manage artificial intelligence safely.

Pope Leo, leader of the Catholic Church, said concerns about the risks of artificial intelligence are not 'fake news' and that AI safety issues should be taken seriously and acted on. The remarks add the Vatican's moral weight to ongoing global debates about regulating AI, drawing attention from commentators discussing the ethical and economic implications of the technology.

President Donald Trump had dinner with Anthropic CEO Darian Amodei ahead of a scheduled gathering with prominent technology leaders. The meeting signals continued outreach by the White House to major artificial intelligence companies, whose executives have increasingly sought influence over policy on AI regulation, safety and government contracts. Details of what was discussed at the dinner have not been released, and attention is focused on the broader event with tech executives that follows.

The United Nations University argues that artificial intelligence regulation should be grounded in human rights rather than technology-specific rules. The piece contends that existing international human rights frameworks — covering privacy, non-discrimination and freedom of expression — already provide a basis for holding governments and companies accountable as AI systems spread into public services and daily life, and calls for these principles to anchor new governance efforts.

Ukraine's digital minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, says Kyiv wants European countries and companies to use Ukraine as a sandbox for developing and testing artificial intelligence technologies. The proposal positions the country, which has built deep digital expertise during the war, as a live testing environment for EU AI innovation and regulation.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei are set to attend a meeting at the White House on artificial intelligence. The gathering brings together leading AI executives with US officials as Washington continues to weigh policy on the fast-moving technology, including safety, competition and national security concerns.

Bill Gates has urged US legislators and law enforcement to regulate the development of artificial intelligence, saying in a television interview with Kristen Welker that oversight is needed. The comments are drawing attention as debate intensifies over how far governments should go in policing AI development.

The Wall Street Journal runs an opinion piece asking who will actually enforce the growing body of rules on artificial intelligence. As governments and companies roll out AI regulations, the piece argues that oversight remains fragmented, with no clear authority or mechanism to hold developers accountable. Commentators are weighing in on whether existing regulators can keep pace with the technology.

Malaysia's Science Minister has called on ASEAN to adopt common standards for its fast-growing space sector, arguing that coordinated rules are needed as space activity expands across Southeast Asia. The appeal highlights growing regional interest in satellites, launch services and space technology, and the risk that differing national regulations could hold back cooperation and investment.

The Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank has published five insights from its payments chief on the future of fintech, outlining how the sector is expected to evolve and how regulators and banks are responding to innovation in payments. The release touches on themes shaping the next phase of financial technology, from faster payments infrastructure to collaboration between regulators and private firms.

A new essay argues that deliberately slowing the adoption of new technologies can be a virtue rather than an obstacle to progress. The piece makes the case for institutional caution, suggesting societies benefit when they resist pressure to deploy powerful tools — such as artificial intelligence or biotechnology — before understanding their consequences. It frames 'foot-dragging' as a form of democratic oversight, allowing time for regulation, public debate and the correction of early mistakes, and challenges the assumption that faster is always better in innovation policy.

A former safety lead at OpenAI says frontier AI models should be regulated as strictly as nuclear power plants. He argued that releases of powerful AI systems need 'layers of redundancy and careful, time-consuming planning,' drawing a parallel between advanced AI and other high-stakes technologies where accidents carry severe consequences.

Oman has drafted a national law aimed at regulating and developing its space economy, according to a report carried by Zawya. The legislation would establish a legal framework for space activities in the Gulf state as regional governments compete to attract investment in satellites, launch services and space technology. Details of the draft's provisions and its timeline for approval have not yet been made public.

A new commentary argues that artificial intelligence companies should draw lessons from the history of nuclear weapons safety, where near-catastrophes, international treaties and strict protocols shaped how the most dangerous technology of the twentieth century was controlled. The author suggests similar oversight, regulation and institutional caution could help manage the risks posed by increasingly powerful AI systems.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Fox Business that Congress should not impose a moratorium or strict limits on artificial intelligence, warning that 'hyperregulating' the technology would cost the United States the race against China. He said he would resist what he called the 'Bernie Sanders call' to impose strict limits on the industry.