search
immigration court
Trends
- 1Volunteers and faith leaders accompany immigrants to court across the US●All over the US, people have been keeping up a presence in # immigration court to deter # ICE from kidnapping law abidin
Across the United States, people are showing up at immigration court hearings to accompany immigrants and deter ICE from detaining them. Among them is Sister Rose Patrice, a Catholic nun whose presence supporters say matters, as faith leaders have been shown to influence outcomes in these cases.
- 2Judge holds Trump administration in contempt over El Salvador deportation●Kyle Cheney: "A federal judge (Trump-appointed Stephanie Gallagher) has held the Trump administration in contempt for de
A federal judge, Trump appointee Stephanie Gallagher, has held the Trump administration in contempt for deporting a man to El Salvador in violation of three court orders. The judge is ordering the government to return him. The ruling, reported by Politico legal correspondent Kyle Cheney, is drawing attention as part of the broader legal fight over the administration's immigration enforcement and compliance with court rulings.
- 3
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 4Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 5Judge orders release of records on Nazi war criminals in Canada●Judge orders release of records on Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada
A judge has ordered the Canadian government to release records concerning Nazi war criminals who settled in Canada after the Second World War. The ruling could reveal how such individuals were admitted to the country and how postwar immigration screening was handled, renewing attention on Canada's efforts to address its wartime-era admissions.
- 6Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 7Cuban man's year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court ruling▼A year in ICE detention: Cuban man’s case tests Supreme Court detention ruling
A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is being used to test the reach of a recent Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. Reported by El Paso Matters, the story highlights how the high court's decision is being applied in practice to people held for prolonged periods, raising questions about how long immigrants can be kept in custody and under what legal limits.
- 8Supreme Court lets DHS overhaul immigration database for midterms▼Supreme Court, over liberal dissents, lets DHS overhaul immigration database for midterms
The Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to proceed with an overhaul of its immigration database ahead of the midterm elections, over the dissents of the Court's liberal justices. The decision lifts a block on the DHS plan, which critics warn could affect immigration records used in voter-related checks, while supporters argue it is a routine modernization effort.
- 9Trump-Appointed Judge Holds DHS in Contempt Over Repeat Deportation▼Trump-Appointed Judge Holds DHS in Contempt after Asylum Seeker Deported Twice despite Court Orders
A federal judge appointed by President Trump has held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt after an asylum seeker was deported twice in defiance of active court orders. The ruling highlights repeated failures by immigration authorities to comply with judicial directives, and is drawing attention to tensions between the administration's deportation push and the courts overseeing it.
- 10EFF urges court to strike drone rule barring filming immigration agents●Vacate a drone restriction that criminalized recording immigration agents
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized recording immigration agents from the air. The group argues the rule blocks lawful First Amendment activity, preventing the public and journalists from documenting federal immigration enforcement operations. The case is now before the appeals court, drawing attention from civil liberties advocates.
- 11Judge allows Highway Patrol traffic stops alongside ICE to continue▼Federal judge denies request to block Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in tandem with ICE
A federal judge has denied a request to block Tennessee Highway Patrol traffic stops conducted in coordination with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The ruling allows the joint enforcement operations to continue while the legal challenge proceeds. The decision is likely to draw reaction from immigration advocates who oppose the stops and from supporters of tougher immigration enforcement.
- 12Supreme Court lets Trump administration access Social Security data●Infuriating, but⚡"IMMEDIATE IMPACT ON THE UPCOMING # ELECTION IS LIKELY LIMITED”🚨"In non-MO emerg dkt, # SCOTUS *grants*
The Supreme Court has granted the Trump administration's emergency request for a stay in the SAVE case, allowing the Department of Homeland Security access to certain Social Security information over the objection of the three Democratic-appointed justices. Legal commentators note the decision's immediate impact on the upcoming election is likely limited, since existing law already restricts how the data can be used, but critics call the ruling infuriating and a worrying expansion of immigration enforcement powers.
- 13Children facing immigration court alone draws concern▼One child facing immigration court alone is too many
Advocacy commentary is highlighting the plight of migrant children who must appear in immigration court proceedings without legal representation or a guardian. Critics argue that requiring a child to navigate complex deportation hearings alone is unjust and inhumane, renewing debate over how the immigration system treats unaccompanied minors.
- 14Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for critical remarks●Justice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.
- 15Judge Blocks Trump Media Ban as Political Show CoversCulture and Faith●NOW PLAYING == Culture, Faith, and Politics 9/24/26: Judge Blocks Trump's Media Ban | Susan Collins Is Toast | Immigrant
A political commentary program aired on September 24, 2026 discussing a judge blocking one of Trump's media-related bans, claims that Senator Susan Collins faces a doomed political future, and reports that immigrants are leaving the United States. The show frames these stories through the lens of culture, faith and politics, reflecting how courts, elections and immigration are dominating discussion among politically engaged faith-oriented audiences.
- 16LDF Condemns Supreme Court Ruling Restoring Trump's SAVE Database●LDF Strongly Condemns the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision to Restore Trump Administration’s SAVE Database
The Legal Defense Fund has strongly condemned a U.S. Supreme Court decision to restore the Trump administration's SAVE database. The civil rights organisation says the ruling allows the immigration database system to continue operating, a move it criticises sharply. Few further details have been given, and reaction beyond the LDF's statement is not yet clear.
- 17Judge Permanently Bars ICE Detention at 26 Federal Plaza▼Judge Permanently Bars ICE from Unconstitutional Detention at 26 Federal Plaza
A federal judge has issued a permanent injunction barring ICE from detaining immigrants at 26 Federal Plaza in New York, finding the practice unconstitutional. The ruling ends a contested detention operation at the Manhattan federal building and marks a significant legal setback for the agency's expanded immigration enforcement in the city.
- 18Judge Halts Construction of ICE Detention Facility in Gilroy▼Judge orders pause on ICE detention facility construction in Gilroy due to environmental concerns
A judge has ordered a pause on construction of an ICE detention facility in Gilroy, California, citing environmental concerns. The ruling temporarily stops the project while environmental review issues are addressed, adding another legal setback to federal immigration detention expansion efforts in the Bay Area.
- 19Lawmaker denied entry to secretive Manhattan immigration courtroom▼Member of Congress denied access to secretive new immigration courtroom in Manhattan
A member of Congress says they were denied access to a new, secretive immigration courtroom operating in Manhattan. The reported refusal has raised questions about transparency in immigration proceedings and why a federal courtroom would be closed to oversight, including to elected officials seeking to observe its operations firsthand.