federal appeals court

A US appeals court has upheld the designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a ruling with implications for the Pentagon's ability to restrict the firm's involvement in defense-related technology procurement. The decision keeps the designation in place despite the company's challenge, and is drawing attention given Anthropic's prominence in the artificial intelligence sector and its government contracts.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a patent dispute against Google, ruling that the internet advertising patents in question are ineligible under Section 101 of the Patent Act for claiming abstract ideas. The decision closes off the case and reinforces the judiciary's restrictive approach to software and business-method patents.

Prediction market operator Kalshi has lost a ruling at the appeals court level concerning whether state regulators can oversee its prediction markets. The decision means states may retain authority to regulate or restrict certain event contracts, a setback for Kalshi's argument that federal law preempts state oversight of its business. The ruling is likely to shape ongoing disputes between prediction market platforms and state gaming and securities regulators.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Ohio may regulate Kalshi's sports event contracts, a decision with implications for the prediction-market platform's operations in the state. The ruling comes amid broader disputes between Kalshi and state regulators over whether its sports contracts constitute gambling subject to state oversight or federally regulated financial products.

A federal appeals court has sided with Hawaii's firearm regulations, upholding the state's requirements that gun permit applicants apply within a set window and that authorities may inspect permitted firearms. The ruling keeps in place two of Hawaii's strict gun control measures, which are among the toughest in the United States.