US voters

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

Civil rights and voting organizations have launched a national campaign to mobilize 100,000 Black men ahead of the US midterm elections. Organizers say jobs, affordability, education and voting rights are the key issues driving the push to engage Black male voters, a group they see as crucial to turnout in close races.

Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential impact on the upcoming US midterm elections. Local news outlets across the country are reporting on how the rulings could influence voter turnout, campaign messaging, and which issues dominate the electoral landscape, as both parties assess the political consequences ahead of the vote.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

The Supreme Court has allowed the Department of Homeland Security to proceed with an overhaul of its immigration database, ruling over dissents from the Court's liberal justices. The decision lands weeks before the US midterm elections, and immigration advocates and critics are debating its potential impact on data used in enforcement and voter-related checks.

The US Postal Service says it will refuse to deliver mail ballots in states that do not turn over voter lists, as demanded under a proposal pushed by President Trump. The standoff raises the prospect of disrupted mail voting, with states and federal officials at odds over voter data access ahead of upcoming elections.

New polling of Texas voters shows Democrats ahead in both the gubernatorial and US Senate races, with state Representative James Talarico drawing attention as a potential candidate. The survey is fueling speculation about Democrats' chances of breaking through in a state where they have long fallen short in statewide contests, and Talarico's name is circulating prominently in discussions of the race.

ABC7 Chicago has published a guide for the 2026 US midterm elections covering Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, explaining when Election Day falls, how to register to vote, and where to find early voting and polling place information. The guide is aimed at helping residents across the three states prepare to cast ballots in next year's midterms.

Several US states are weighing temporary suspensions of their gasoline taxes, so-called gas tax holidays, as a way to ease fuel costs for drivers ahead of Election Day. The proposals come as pump prices remain a top economic concern for voters, and governors and lawmakers are weighing tax relief against the revenue those taxes fund for road and infrastructure projects.

Former staffers have leveled allegations of hostile workplace behavior against Mary Peltola, and the claims could shape Alaska's competitive US Senate race. The Anchorage Daily News examined how the accusations might land with voters in a contest where character questions can prove decisive. It remains to be seen whether the allegations alter the race's dynamics or fade as campaigns intensify.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision, reported by AP News and NewsNation, allows the administration to continue the programme while legal challenges proceed. The database is intended to check voter eligibility, and critics and supporters are weighing its implications for election administration and voter access.

Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania voted against a War Powers resolution aimed at blocking US military action against Iran, defying most of his party once again. The vote adds to a string of occasions where Fetterman has split from fellow Democrats, particularly on foreign policy and Israel- and Iran-related issues, drawing criticism from progressive voters and praise from moderates.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

A new poll finds rural voters are increasingly concerned about the economy as the US midterm elections draw closer. Inflation, jobs and the cost of living are weighing heavily on these communities, whose turnout could prove decisive in key Senate, House and state races. Commentators are watching whether economic anxiety will push rural voters toward Republicans or keep Democrats competitive.

A new commentary by McCarthy in the North State Journal examines how a pardon granted to a convicted felon intersects with US immigration politics. The piece weighs the political consequences of clemency decisions and their implications for immigration debates, a topic already dividing lawmakers and voters as the issue remains central to national political fights.

Republican congressman Mike Waltz has echoed his party's argument that Russia's war in Ukraine is the main driver of high energy prices. He joins a growing chorus of GOP figures making the claim, part of a broader debate over who bears responsibility for rising fuel costs and how US energy policy should respond to the conflict.

The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.

A Jerusalem Post opinion piece argues that Israel's upcoming election should be determined solely by Israeli voters, not by American politicians. The column pushes back against US political figures weighing in on Israel's democratic process, reflecting ongoing friction over American involvement in Israeli domestic politics as the election approaches.

Columnist Ron Bousso argues that restricting US diesel exports would play well politically with drivers facing high fuel prices, but makes poor economic sense. The US is a major diesel exporter, and curbing shipments would squeeze refiners and global supply while doing little to lower pump prices at home. The piece frames the tension between voter-friendly energy rhetoric and market reality.

Health care costs have emerged as a major concern for voters ahead of the United States midterm elections. Reporting notes that affordability of medical care is weighing heavily on voters' decisions as the elections approach. The issue is expected to feature prominently in campaigns and debates as candidates respond to voter priorities.

The US Supreme Court has reinstated the Trump administration's large-scale voter verification system, allowing election officials to resume mass checks of voter registration data. The decision revives a contested policy that critics said risked purging eligible voters, while supporters argue it protects election integrity. The ruling is expected to shape voting-rights disputes ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration's expansive federal database for use in voter roll screening, per the New York Times. The move is likely to intensify debate over election integrity versus voter access, with critics warning it could lead to improper purges of eligible voters while supporters frame it as a safeguard against noncitizen voting.

25News asked members of Congress whether federal lawmakers should regulate artificial intelligence, putting the question directly to the representatives who would write the rules. The reporting highlights where US lawmakers stand on AI oversight, an issue that divides Congress as lawmakers weigh innovation against risks like misinformation, privacy and job losses.