Supreme

Following the Supreme Court's ruling that former presidents have broad immunity for official acts, Donald Trump is invoking the decision widely as he pushes to expand presidential power. The report examines how Trump and his allies are using the landmark ruling to justify sweeping executive actions, raising concerns about the limits of presidential accountability.

The US Supreme Court has turned down the Trump administration's effort to impose restrictions on mail-in voting. The decision preserves existing access to absentee ballots, a voting method used by millions of Americans. The ruling is drawing attention from both parties, with critics of the restrictions calling it a win for voter access and Republicans weighing the setback ahead of future elections.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. Supporters say the ruling helps states ensure only eligible voters are on the rolls, while critics warn it could lead to wrongful purges of eligible voters and raises questions about the accuracy of federal immigration records used in election administration.

The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 decision that commentators say carries major nationwide and constitutional implications. The ruling is drawing wide attention, with discussion focusing on what its uniform verdict means for constitutional law across the country. Details of the specific case and its practical effects remain the subject of ongoing debate.

President Donald Trump criticized the Supreme Court for upholding birthright citizenship, saying 'too bad' about the ruling, and is pushing Congress to pass legislation ending the practice. The comments put immigration back at the center of political debate, with questions over whether any law could override the Constitution's 14th Amendment guarantee of citizenship to those born on US soil.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions in the killings of his wife Maggie and son Paul. Murdaugh, a former lawyer, was convicted in 2023 in a case that drew national attention. The ruling throws the high-profile verdict into question, and it remains to be seen whether prosecutors will seek a retrial.

The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating the bulk of his trade measures. The decision marks a major legal setback for the president's trade policy, striking at the core of an economic agenda that has defined his administration's approach to imports.

The US Supreme Court has issued an unexpected ruling on a Friday night, drawing heavy attention online. Commentary is focused on the timing and contents of the decision, which was announced with little warning. Details of the ruling's subject and consequences remain limited pending official release of the full opinion.

Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to a Wall Street Journal report. His recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially raising the stakes for any ties. No reason for his withdrawal from the case has been given in the report.

A group of immigrants is asking the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb protections that currently keep them from being removed to nations other than their home countries while the case continues.

The Supreme Court has revived a voter purge scheme backed by Donald Trump, according to Democracy Docket's breaking report. The ruling allows the purge effort to move forward, and voting rights advocates are sounding alarm over its potential impact on eligible voters ahead of elections. Critics describe the decision as a major setback for ballot access, while supporters view it as restoring state authority over election rolls.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard, according to a New York Times report. The recusal of a justice at the last minute from such a consequential case is highly unusual, and it remains unclear what prompted the decision or how it will affect the court's handling of the dispute.

The legal groups that won the Supreme Court case upholding birthright citizenship have filed new motions responding to the administration's latest executive order. The ACLU of DC is among the organizations behind the filings, signaling a continuation of the legal battle over presidential authority and citizenship rights. The development follows their earlier Supreme Court victory, and the new motions aim to counter the most recent executive action on the issue.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, but his withdrawal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially increasing the chance of a split ruling on an issue with far-reaching environmental and regulatory consequences.

The Supreme Court of India heard arguments that the Election Commission must not only be independent but also appear independent to the public. The remarks came during proceedings concerning the appointment and accountability of Election Commissioners, with the court stressing that public perception of impartiality matters as much as actual autonomy. The hearing has drawn wide attention ahead of electoral debates in the country.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change case before the court. The announcement, reported by SCOTUSblog, removes one justice from a dispute with potential consequences for climate regulation, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. Reasons for the withdrawal were not stated in the report.

Israel's Supreme Court is expected to decide this week whether Arab parties can be barred from running in the upcoming elections. The attempt to exclude them has triggered anger and uncertainty among Arab citizens and their representatives, adding a contentious dimension to an already heated election campaign in Israel.

Virginia Democrats have asked the US Supreme Court to override a state court decision that rejected their congressional redistricting plan. The dispute centres on who has final authority over the state's electoral maps, with Democrats arguing the state ruling should be reviewed by the nation's highest court. The case adds to ongoing national battles over redistricting ahead of future elections.

An Iranian cleric claims Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was injured before the war with Iran began and had to be pulled from the rubble of a hospital in Tehran after an Israeli strike. The claim has been reported by The Jerusalem Post but has not been independently confirmed, and Iran has not officially commented. The reported injury, if true, would shed new light on the Supreme Leader's visibility and condition during the conflict.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move comes amid scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest surrounding the justice. The reversal is drawing attention to ethical questions facing the Supreme Court and to the stakes of the climate litigation, which could have significant consequences for environmental regulation in the United States.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to reports from USA Today and the Detroit Free Press. The move means the remaining eight justices will decide the landmark litigation. His withdrawal is drawing attention because recusals at the Supreme Court are rare and the case could shape US climate policy.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The rare public rift between sitting justices drew attention because the court typically presents a unified front, and disagreements are usually aired in written dissents rather than direct personal remarks. The apology appears aimed at defusing tensions within the institution.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending climate change case, according to multiple US news outlets. No reason for his recusal was given in the reports. His absence could affect the outcome of the case, which is seen as pivotal for climate-related litigation and regulation in the United States.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his holdings in oil stocks. The decision removes him from proceedings with potentially far-reaching consequences for climate regulation, and it has renewed debate over the ethical standards and financial disclosure rules governing Supreme Court justices.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, which reportedly involves housing inmates according to their sex assigned at birth. A lower court had paused the policy while litigation continues. The request puts the dispute before the nation's highest court, adding to a series of emergency applications the administration has filed on contested policy matters.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to let it deny hormone therapy to transgender inmates, in a move reported by the New York Times. The filing asks the justices to intervene in litigation over prison healthcare for transgender people. The request is drawing attention from civil rights advocates and reigniting debate over transgender rights and the treatment of incarcerated people under the administration.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has removed himself from a major climate-related case following scrutiny over his holdings of oil company stock. The recusal comes amid criticism of his financial disclosures and renewed debate over ethics rules for Supreme Court justices and potential conflicts of interest in cases touching the energy industry.