Our Changing Climate

With world leaders gathered for COP31 in Türkiye, a simple message — 'It is time to change our planet' — is resonating with millions and topping discussions on climate change. The slogan reflects growing public pressure on governments to move beyond pledges and deliver concrete action on emissions, adaptation and climate finance at the summit.

Debate is intensifying over how best to tackle climate change, with competing framings of the challenge. Some see it primarily as a security threat requiring urgent protective measures, others as a demand for economic and lifestyle sacrifice, while a third camp frames it as an opportunity for growth and innovation. The disagreement over which vision should guide policy is shaping discussion ahead of international climate negotiations.

The Congress to Campus program brought current and former members of Congress to Ithaca College for a bipartisan discussion on climate change. The event gave students a chance to hear opposing political perspectives on climate policy and question lawmakers directly. Coverage in The Ithacan highlighted the value of cross-party dialogue on an issue often dominated by partisan division.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments in a case brought against major oil companies over their role in climate change. The case tests whether fossil fuel producers can be held liable for climate damages and whether such claims belong in state or federal courts. Observers say the ruling could shape the future of climate litigation across the United States.

Météo-France placed the Aude, Hérault and Pyrénées-Orientales on yellow rain-flood and storm vigilance, with up to 200 mm of rain possible locally. A viral video showed a high school north of Montpellier flooded, while forecasters said a remarkable Mediterranean rain episode in the south-east was ending Thursday. Debate continues over whether climate change is altering the Mediterranean storm season.

New attention is being drawn to figures showing the world's oceans and atmosphere are trapping heat at a rate equivalent to roughly four Hiroshima atomic bomb explosions every second. The comparison, popularised by climate scientists to convey the scale of global warming, is circulating again as discussions about rising ocean temperatures and greenhouse gas emissions continue.

US Supreme Court justices have expressed differing views during arguments in a case examining whether major oil producers can be held liable for climate change damages. The dispute centers on whether lawsuits seeking compensation from energy companies should proceed in state courts or be blocked at the federal level. A ruling could shape how communities pursue claims against fossil fuel firms, and observers are watching closely for signals on how the court may lean.

The US Supreme Court has given mixed signals on whether state tort lawsuits seeking to hold energy companies financially liable for climate change can proceed. The cases, brought by states and municipalities against major oil and gas producers, could reshape who pays for climate damage. Observers are watching closely for indications of how the justices might rule.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments in a case addressing whether major energy companies can be held legally liable for climate change damages. The outcome could determine whether oil and gas producers face lawsuits from states and municipalities seeking compensation for climate-related harm, with major implications for the energy industry and climate litigation nationwide.

A new review in the Anchorage Daily News examines 'Unfrozen: The Fight for the Future of the Arctic', a book arguing that the region's long-standing promise of peaceful cooperation is eroding. As melting ice opens new shipping routes and resources, rivalry among Arctic powers is intensifying, and the book explores what that competition means for the region's environmental, political and strategic future.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a climate change case linked to a Colorado wildfire that burned nearly five years ago. The case is expected to address questions of climate liability and accountability, drawing attention from environmental groups, energy companies and state officials awaiting the court's ruling.

The US Supreme Court is hearing a case that centers on who can be held financially responsible for damages caused by climate change. The dispute addresses whether companies and governments can face liability claims for climate-related harms, a question with major implications for lawsuits seeking compensation for extreme weather and other climate impacts.

Climate researchers in the San Francisco Bay Area are explaining how a Kelvin Wave impacts ocean waters. The phenomenon, an eastward-moving pulse of warm water along the equator, can influence sea surface temperatures and weather patterns, including conditions linked to El Nino. The explanation has drawn significant public attention as people seek to understand how such ocean changes may affect coastal climates and marine ecosystems.

Forecasts suggest the Atlantic could record no hurricanes for the first time in roughly a hundred years, an extraordinary outcome for a basin that normally produces multiple storms each season. Meteorologists are weighing the role of unusual ocean and atmospheric conditions, while readers debate whether the quiet season reflects natural variability or broader climate shifts.

The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments in lawsuits over climate change, with live coverage from NBC News. The cases could shape whether oil companies and other polluters can be sued by states and cities for damages tied to global warming. Viewers are following the session closely, with tens of thousands engaging with the live broadcast as the justices weigh a question with major consequences for climate liability litigation across the country.

The US Supreme Court began its new term with a climate change case that left the justices struggling during oral arguments, according to NBC News. The report says the panel appeared stumped by the questions raised in the dispute, underscoring how difficult climate-related litigation has become for the court. Details of the parties and the specific legal issue were not immediately provided.

The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case examining whether major oil companies can be held legally liable for climate change damages. The outcome could determine whether local governments and states can sue fossil fuel producers in state courts for costs tied to rising seas, wildfires, and extreme weather. A ruling against the industry would open the door to a wave of climate damages litigation across the country.

The US Supreme Court has begun its new term with a climate change case described as highly consequential. The case could shape how far federal agencies can go in regulating emissions, with potential consequences for environmental policy across the United States.

A major legal fight over climate change has reached the US Supreme Court, opening what is expected to be a consequential battle over how far the federal government and courts can go in addressing global warming. The case could reshape the legal landscape for climate regulation, and observers are watching closely for signals about how the conservative-leaning court will rule.

Arizona Democrats held a town hall where they argued the state cannot afford to wait any longer to address climate change. They called for swifter action on the issues facing the state, which faces intensifying heat, drought and wildfire risks. The event highlighted climate policy as a growing priority for the party in Arizona.

The US Supreme Court is beginning its new term with a closely watched climate change case, a story carried by NPR and public radio outlets across the country. The case is drawing attention for its potential effect on how climate-related disputes are handled in American courts, as observers weigh what the justices' decision could mean for future litigation and regulation.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments in a case seeking to hold fossil fuel companies financially liable for damages caused by climate change. The case tests whether oil and gas producers can be sued for the costs of extreme weather and other climate impacts. The outcome could shape similar lawsuits brought by states and cities across the country.

The US Supreme Court heard arguments suggesting a wary stance on state-level lawsuits seeking to hold oil producers liable for climate change damages. Justices' questioning indicated concern about states using courts to regulate emissions or extract compensation from energy companies, a outcome that could shape dozens of pending climate liability cases brought by states and municipalities across the country.

A new global review reports significant blind spots in scientific understanding of how climate change is affecting Mediterranean ecosystems. The study suggests current research coverage is uneven, leaving key regions, species and processes poorly documented, and calls for more comprehensive monitoring to guide conservation and climate adaptation efforts in these vulnerable biodiversity hotspots.

A case before the US Supreme Court could determine whether major oil companies can be made to pay damages for climate change. The outcome may decide if lawsuits seeking to hold fossil fuel producers financially responsible for climate-related harms can move forward, with significant implications for the energy industry and communities seeking compensation.

Attention is turning to how a warming climate could reshape malaria transmission. Rising temperatures, shifting rainfall patterns and longer warm seasons can expand the range of the mosquitoes that carry the disease, putting new populations at risk while potentially reducing transmission in some currently hot regions. Researchers and data outlets are examining where these changes are likely to hit hardest and what that means for global health planning.

The US Supreme Court heard arguments over energy companies' attempt to stop a major climate-change lawsuit from moving forward. The case centers on whether industry defendants can be held liable in state or local courts for damages linked to their fossil fuel emissions. Oil and gas companies argue the claims belong in federal court, while plaintiffs want them heard where they were filed.

A battle over major oil companies has reached the US Supreme Court, with climate change impacts taking center stage. The case reportedly highlights damage linked to warming temperatures, including killer beetle infestations that have devastated forests and left them primed to burn. The litigation could determine whether energy companies can be held liable in state courts for climate-related harms, a question with sweeping consequences for the industry and communities seeking compensation.