AI policy experts

CNN reports on how artificial intelligence has come to dominate the agenda of a major climate event, a development with implications for how climate policy and technology now intersect. Details of which event and how AI shaped it are limited to the headline, and reactions from attendees or experts are not included in the available reporting.

A report from the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk examines the concept of an intelligence explosion, laying out how rapidly improving frontier artificial intelligence systems might recursively improve themselves beyond human control. The piece breaks down the arguments for and against the idea and what they would mean for safety policy. Readers are debating whether the report's framing of frontier AI risks is accurate or overly speculative.

An organiser has written about their experience co-leading an AI safety bootcamp aimed at legal and governance practitioners, sharing what they learnt from the programme. The piece reflects growing efforts to equip lawyers, compliance experts and policymakers with the technical understanding needed to govern AI systems, a topic drawing attention among those working at the intersection of law and artificial intelligence.

The Open Data Institute is hosting a free webinar titled 'Better interventions: AI chatbots must not be the new social media', part of its Data-Centric AI series. A panel of experts will discuss how to investigate AI systems for systemic risks and put early oversight in place, drawing comparisons with the harms that went unchecked during the rise of social media platforms.

Proofpoint reports that the China-nexus threat group TA419 is running adversary-in-the-middle credential phishing against U.S. AI policy experts. The attackers impersonate economists, policymakers and an Anthropic employee, using a lure titled "Request for Feedback on Military Integration of Claude". The attack chain ends on an OneDrive page using a frameless browser-in-the-browser technique to harvest credentials.

An AI safety agreement backed by President Trump has been signed by OpenAI, Google, Anthropic and Meta, but experts are voicing doubts about whether it will have any real effect. Critics say the voluntary commitments from the companies lack enforcement mechanisms, raising concerns that the deal may amount to little more than a public gesture. The debate highlights ongoing tension between US industry-led AI policy and calls for binding safeguards.

The NYU Migration Network is holding its annual conference focused on artificial intelligence and immigration policy. The gathering brings together researchers, policymakers and practitioners to examine how AI tools are reshaping migration governance, from border management and asylum processing to visa screening, and to weigh the ethical and legal implications of these technologies for migrants worldwide.

The Council on Foreign Relations has published an expert Q&A addressing questions about artificial intelligence. The piece offers analysis of key issues around AI development and policy, reflecting growing public and institutional interest in understanding the technology's implications.

Cybersecurity firm Proofpoint reports that hackers linked to China posed as US artificial intelligence policy experts in a targeted campaign. The attackers reportedly used the fabricated identities to build trust with recipients, likely aiming to deliver malicious content or gather intelligence. The activity highlights growing interest by state-linked groups in AI policy circles in Washington.

Policy debate is turning to how the health sector should manage artificial intelligence tools that are being adopted faster than safety rules are being written. The core concern is that AI systems used in diagnosis, administration and patient care lack clear regulatory guardrails, leaving providers, developers and regulators to weigh innovation against patient safety without an established framework.