Law & Courts

The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of President Trump's tariffs, invalidating most of the import duties imposed under his trade agenda. The decision marks a major legal setback for the administration's economic policy and is set to reshape US trade relations, with reactions pouring in from lawmakers, businesses and trading partners worldwide.

A White House policy restricting media access has triggered a legal and political firestorm, with CNN's legal analysis asserting that President Trump's legal position has 'shifted dramatically' as challenges unfold. Commentators are weighing the ban against First Amendment protections and the press's traditional access to the presidency, keeping the dispute at the center of US political debate.

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban preventing certain media outlets from access to the White House. The ruling reaffirms press freedom protections, limiting the administration's ability to exclude journalists from presidential coverage. The decision is drawing wide attention as part of ongoing legal battles between the Trump administration and news organisations over access and First Amendment rights.

Following the Supreme Court's sweeping ruling on presidential immunity, Donald Trump is invoking it broadly as he seeks to expand executive power. The decision, which shielded official presidential acts from prosecution, is being used by Trump to justify a wide range of actions, drawing concern from critics who warn it undermines checks and balances and fuels debate over the limits of presidential authority.

President Trump said Saturday, speaking to reporters outside the White House, that he rejects Iran's offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and resume nuclear talks within seven days. Iran conditioned the proposal on the United States lifting its naval restrictions. The rejection leaves a key shipping route and diplomatic track in limbo, drawing attention to escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran.

A federal judge has overturned the Trump administration's ban barring certain journalists from White House press access. The ruling restores entry privileges and has been widely covered by news outlets as a significant win for press freedom, with debate expected over whether the administration will appeal or comply with the decision.

A federal judge has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's latest legal effort to overturn her conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls, dismissing the attempt as frivolous. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction. The ruling closes off another avenue in her ongoing efforts to challenge the verdict from prison.

A German court has ruled that Meta can be held liable for fraudulent advertisements that ran on Facebook and Instagram, a decision with potentially far-reaching consequences for platform accountability across Europe. Commentators are weighing whether the ruling obliges platforms to screen advertiser identities and how it may interact with obligations under the EU's Digital Services Act.

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore CNN's access to the White House, and the network's reporters are back on the premises. The ruling is being read as a check on the administration's efforts to penalize a major news outlet, with press freedom advocates welcoming the decision while the legal fight over media access continues.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting. The decision blocks efforts to impose limits on the use of mailed ballots, preserving broader access to absentee voting for now. The ruling touches one of the most contested issues in American election policy, following years of litigation over voting rules.

A US judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban barring certain media outlets from White House access, overturning the restriction. The decision has drawn wide attention, with coverage focusing on press freedom implications and the legal limits of presidential control over media access. Supporters of the ruling frame it as a win for the First Amendment, while critics of judicial intervention are likely to contest it.

A judge has referred attorneys representing Donald Trump for potential disciplinary action in connection with a lawsuit involving the IRS. The referral signals the court's concern over the lawyers' conduct in the case and could lead to professional sanctions. Details about the specific allegations and which attorneys are involved remain limited in initial reporting.

Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing for legislation to end the practice. The former president has long sought to eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizens, and is calling on lawmakers to act where the courts would not.

A US jury has ruled that Apple owes a record $5.7 billion in a patent case over haptic technology, the vibration feedback used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent damages awards ever handed down against a major technology company, and attention is turning to whether Apple will appeal the decision.

A California sheriff seized ballots as part of an election investigation, but a court has now ruled to shut the probe down. Legal experts say the decision will resonate nationwide, as it touches on the limits of local law enforcement's power to intervene in election matters and could shape how similar disputes are handled in other states.

The White House has signaled a new media restriction by excluding CNN from the press pool on Air Force One for a presidential trip. The move is being read as part of a broader effort to limit access for outlets the administration views unfavorably, raising concerns among press freedom advocates about shrinking access for mainstream news organizations covering the president.

The Thai government has declared a two-day public holiday for civil servants as severe floods batter the country. The move could affect the timing of a court ruling, since closures may push back official proceedings. The decision highlights the scale of the flooding crisis and its knock-on effects on government business and the justice system, with attention now on whether the ruling will be delayed.

A federal judge has paused the Trump administration's move to bar CNN from the White House, allowing the network's reporters back into the building pending further legal proceedings. The case is part of a broader dispute between the administration and major news outlets over access to the president and press briefings, with press freedom groups closely watching the outcome.

News is breaking that the gag order restricting Donald Trump from commenting on people involved in his criminal case has been lifted or struck down, with the headline framing it as Trump winning removal of the 'media ban'. Commentators are reacting to what the decision means for his public statements during the ongoing legal proceedings and his campaign.

Blake Lively has made a public statement following a court ruling that comes ahead of her scheduled trial with Justin Baldoni. The dispute between the two actors has drawn sustained attention since legal proceedings began, and Lively's remarks mark her first public response to the latest development. The trial has become one of the most closely watched celebrity legal battles, with observers weighing in on the implications for both parties.

A federal court ruling requires Texas to install air conditioning in its prisons by 2029. The decision follows years of complaints and litigation over dangerously high temperatures inside state lockups, where heat has been blamed for deaths of inmates and staff. It marks one of the most significant mandates on prison conditions in the state.

Spain's National Court is examining whether oil deals personally discussed by Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez were connected to the alleged illegal financing of the PSOE, the party leading Spain's government. The case has drawn attention because the same government has repeatedly clashed with Donald Trump, fueling political controversy in Madrid.

London's investment bankers and lawyers have earned more than £1bn in fees from a surge in takeover deals, according to the Guardian. The windfall reflects a busy period for mergers and acquisitions activity in the UK capital, with advisers on both sides of deals collecting substantial payments as companies pursue acquisitions.

Louisiana is becoming the latest state at the center of a voting rights dispute, with the confrontation unfolding as the midterm elections approach. Details of the specific legal or legislative measures involved remain limited, but the story signals that election rules in the state are once again set to become a national political flashpoint.

Virginia Democrats have asked the US Supreme Court to intervene after a state court threw out their redistricting plan, requesting that the justices override the state ruling. The dispute centers on legislative maps drawn after the 2020 census, a fight with potential implications for control of the Virginia General Assembly. Critics and supporters are framing the case as another test of how far courts will go in partisan map-drawing battles.

An ongoing dispute over Missouri's congressional map prompted the Supreme Court to issue a clarification of the Purcell principle, the doctrine limiting courts from altering election rules close to an election. Legal commentators say the episode exposed weaknesses in the court's emergency 'shadow docket' process, where major decisions are made quickly, with limited explanation and without full briefing or argument.

Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential influence on the upcoming US midterm elections. News outlets including KCRA and KOCO are covering how the rulings could affect campaign issues, voter mobilization, and which seats are contested. Analysts suggest the Court's positions on key legal questions may become a focal point for both parties heading into the elections.

The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, preventing the state from implementing new district boundaries that had been advanced by GOP lawmakers. The repeated intervention comes amid an ongoing legal fight over redistricting in the state, with courts weighing whether the map complies with constitutional and voting-rights requirements.

Maryland's attorney general has welcomed a court decision that keeps the state's restriction on Glock-style pistols, often called the "Glock ban," in effect. The ruling means the law remains enforceable while legal challenges continue. Supporters view it as a win for gun regulation, while gun-rights advocates are expected to keep fighting the measure in court.

The Trump administration is seeking to prevent the restoration of climate change and diversity-related information at US historical sites. The move suggests an effort to keep such material removed from exhibits or signage at federally maintained locations. The news has drawn attention amid broader debates over how climate science and diversity topics are handled across government institutions.

Protesters blocked the Orange Order from marching through a Catholic area in Northern Ireland, Reuters reports. The Orange Order is a Protestant fraternal organisation whose parades have long been a flashpoint in the region, and attempts to march through largely Catholic or nationalist neighbourhoods frequently trigger confrontation. The incident is likely to renew debate over parading restrictions and community tensions.

The California Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff acted illegally when he seized roughly 650,000 ballots, and has ordered that they be returned. The decision is being covered internationally, including in Ukrainian-language media, and is expected to intensify debate over election security, law enforcement authority, and the handling of ballots in a US election.

The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 ruling that commentators describe as carrying major nationwide and constitutional implications. The decision, as characterized in coverage of the ruling, is significant both for its broad legal reach and for the rare display of complete agreement among all nine justices on a constitutional question.

A court in Northern Ireland has temporarily blocked an Orange Order march from passing through a Catholic area. The order, a Protestant fraternal organisation, holds parades that have long been a source of tension in the region. The ruling is likely to reignite debate over parading and community relations in Northern Ireland.

A court in Northern Ireland has ruled that a Protestant parade can go ahead through a predominantly Catholic area, according to Sky News. The decision is drawing attention because such marches have long been a source of tension between the region's Protestant unionist and Catholic nationalist communities, and rulings on parade routes often spark protests and public debate.

Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother charged in the deaths of her three children, is set to appear in court for the first time since her trial ended in a mistrial. The hearing marks the next step in a case that has drawn wide attention, with observers waiting to learn how prosecutors and the court will proceed now that the jury failed to reach a verdict.

The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released unexpectedly on a Friday evening, a practice often used for consequential decisions that attract less immediate attention. The decision is drawing heavy public reaction, with commentators urging people to pay close attention to what the justices decided and its implications for US law.

Utah officials say the state will not remove voters from its registration lists based on a database promoted by Donald Trump, even after a Supreme Court ruling that opened the door to such purges. The decision positions Utah against efforts to use the disputed data to challenge voter eligibility, and is drawing attention in the ongoing national fight over election administration and voter roll maintenance.

The Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of a police officer who was disciplined for harassment, confirming the penalty handed down against him. The ruling settles the dispute over the punishment and reinforces that harassment within the force can justify career-level demotion. Reactions are likely to focus on accountability in law enforcement and the standards for disciplining officers over misconduct toward colleagues or the public.

Singapore is cracking down on people who play music and videos loudly on public transportation. Offenders now face fines of up to 500 Singapore dollars. The measure targets inconsiderate behaviour on buses and trains, where noise complaints have long been a common gripe among commuters in the city-state.

Bus passengers in Singapore will face fines for playing music out loud, with penalties ranging from around $400 to $4,000. The move targets noise nuisance on public transport and has drawn attention online, with many debating whether the fines are proportionate and how they will be enforced on busy bus routes.

A lawyer who successfully challenged the Trump administration's ban on MS NOW in court has given a first-ever interview about the case. According to the announcement, the attorney speaks publicly for the first time about the litigation that overturned the restriction on the network. Details of the remarks and the court ruling's terms are not yet available.

President Trump has reportedly suffered a legal setback involving Fox News, with a judge considering stopping the White House's ban on certain press outlets, criticism of which has been framed as 'cancel culture' applied to journalists. The case touches on First Amendment concerns over which news organizations get access to the president, and commentators are weighing what the ruling means for press freedom.

A federal appeals court for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that Ohio can move ahead with regulating Kalshi's sports event contracts, a decision with implications for the fast-growing market in prediction and event-based trading. The ruling signals that state gambling regulators may have authority over such contracts, a outcome being watched closely by both prediction market platforms and state regulators nationwide.

The Supreme Court has rejected a Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for the third time. The repeated rejections mean the contested district boundaries drawn with the former president's support will not take effect as drafted, leaving Missouri's congressional representation governed by existing lines while Republicans consider how to respond to the court's stance.

A judge has ordered New York City officials to turn over their phone messages while keeping the city's rent freeze in place. The ruling keeps current rent rules unchanged for now and requires disclosure of officials' communications. It is expected to feature in ongoing debate over the city's rent policies and the conduct of the officials involved.

Students in Illinois without permanent legal status are adjusting to changes in in-state tuition rules, according to the Jacksonville Journal-Courier. The report, framed by the phrase 'knowledge is free,' highlights how these students and their families are working to access higher education as eligibility requirements shift, and what the changes mean for college access across the state.

A court has once again rejected the city of Baltimore's appeal seeking to block the inspector general's access to city records. The ruling upholds the watchdog's authority to review municipal documents, dealing a repeated legal setback to city officials who have fought to limit oversight. The decision reinforces the independence of the inspector general's office in investigating city government.

The Democracy Defenders Fund said a recent Supreme Court decision does not allow sweeping changes in the current election cycle. The advocacy group's statement suggests the ruling constrains what electoral or legal modifications can be implemented before the upcoming vote. No further details about the case or its specific implications were provided.

The Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning the Department of Homeland Security's voter database, and officials have confirmed it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision resolves questions about whether federal voter data access could affect how the state runs its elections. California's electoral procedures for 2026 will proceed as planned.

A court has issued a split verdict while disposing of the case through a single common order. Split verdicts occur when judges on the same bench disagree on the outcome, often leaving the question to be settled by a larger bench. With no further details available on the case, the parties, or the specific legal question involved, the wider significance of the ruling remains to be seen.

Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe said he is disappointed after a new congressional map favoring Republicans was blocked once again. The map, part of a Republican push to redraw district lines and gain an extra House seat, has now been halted repeatedly by legal challenges. Supporters argue the redraw is lawful; opponents call it a partisan gerrymander aimed at entrenching Republican power.

A Texas appellate court has issued a new ruling in the case of Melissa Lucio, the death-row inmate convicted in the 2007 death of her daughter in the Rio Grande Valley. An editorial from MyRGV.com argues the decision is unlikely to change many minds, reflecting how deeply divided public opinion remains over her conviction and claims that her daughter's injuries resulted from an accidental fall.

A court in Northern Ireland has ruled that the Orange Order may march through a predominantly Catholic area, clearing the way for a procession that had been contested. The decision touches on one of the region's most sensitive issues, as Orange Order parades through nationalist neighbourhoods have repeatedly sparked tensions between unionist and nationalist communities and drawn scrutiny of how parades are regulated.

A court in Northern Ireland has ruled that a Protestant loyal order march can proceed through a predominantly Catholic area, according to Reuters. Parading disputes remain one of the most sensitive issues in Northern Ireland, and decisions like this often draw strong reactions from nationalist residents and mediation bodies. The ruling is likely to prompt debate over parade restrictions and community tensions ahead of the marching season.

A circuit court has ruled that Ohio's Bureau of Motor Vehicles may require proof of citizenship when handling voter registration. The decision lets the state enforce stricter documentation rules at BMV locations, a move supporters frame as protecting election integrity and critics warn could discourage eligible voters from registering. The case is part of a broader national fight over proof-of-citizenship requirements for voting.

The Montana Supreme Court has changed its position on a ballot initiative in Butte concerning a proposed data center, reversing an earlier stance on whether the measure can move forward. The ruling affects local efforts to put the data center question before voters, and the turnaround has drawn attention in the region as residents and officials assess what the decision means for the project and the community.

South Korea's Supreme Court has upheld the demotion of a police officer, citing a confession the officer recorded in a personal sketchbook. The ruling confirms that the handwritten confession could be used to justify the disciplinary demotion. The decision settles the disciplinary case and offers guidance on how personal written records can factor into police misconduct proceedings.

The eviction case involving the Little Red Hen, a Seattle bar, has been dismissed, meaning the venue is not being forced out for now. A KING 5 report framed the decision with a nod to the bar's famous sign and name, noting it can keep its doors open. The ruling ends the immediate dispute, though details of why the case was thrown out were not provided.

A 78-year-old woman in France has taken her GP to court, seeking disciplinary sanctions over the doctor's alleged attempt to place her in a nursing home (Ehpad). The patient called the doctor's conduct unacceptable, remarking that a medical consultation is not a restaurant. The case raises debate over patient autonomy, elderly care decisions and the limits of a GP's authority in France.

The Montana Supreme Court has refused to grant a new trial to a man from Kila convicted of a 2022 murder in Martin City, upholding the original conviction. The ruling closes off one avenue of appeal for the defendant, and the decision is drawing attention in northwest Montana as the case moves toward final resolution.