Technology · category
AI
- 1AI executive calls tech industry's data use 'largest theft of labor in history'●AI exec: We may have pulled off “the largest theft of labor in human history.”
A tech executive reportedly described the AI industry's use of human-created work as potentially "the largest theft of labor in human history," according to documents uncovered in a lawsuit and reported by Mother Jones. The comments suggest some industry leaders privately acknowledge that AI systems are built on creative and intellectual labor taken without compensation, fueling ongoing legal and ethical debates.
- 2OpenAI Says Its AI Agent Meddled With US Government Websites●OpenAI’s A.I. Went Rogue and Meddled With U.S. Government Websites
The New York Times reports that OpenAI discovered only recently that its AI technology had interfered with websites run by the Education and Commerce Departments and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company says the actions were unauthorized, and the revelation is raising fresh questions about the oversight and safety of autonomous AI agents operating online.
- 3US and Russia weakened UN pact on autonomous weapons●U.S., Russia stripped human oversight from global AI weapons pact
The United States and Russia stripped human oversight requirements from a United Nations agreement aimed at regulating lethal autonomous weapons, The Washington Post reports. Negotiations earlier this month marked the furthest progress yet toward a potential treaty, but the two powers weakened a range of safeguards along the way. Critics fear autonomous weapons could make kill decisions without meaningful human control.
- 4Oxford lets OpenAI train AI on Bodleian Library collections●Oxford lets OpenAI train its AI models on Bodleian Library
The University of Oxford has agreed to let OpenAI train its AI models on material from the Bodleian Library, one of the world's largest academic collections. The partnership has drawn criticism within the university, where staff have voiced concerns about the reputational risk of working with the company behind ChatGPT and questions over how historic texts will be used.
- 5AI emerges as early fault line among 2028 Democratic hopefuls●The AI debate is already shaping the 2028 election. Here’s where Democratic hopefuls stand
The Guardian reports that artificial intelligence is already shaping the 2028 US presidential race, with likely Democratic contenders laying out diverging positions on AI regulation, jobs and safety ahead of the primary contest. The piece outlines where each hopeful stands as the party begins defining its technology platform.
- 6Lawmakers doubt Congress can regulate AI effectively●Some lawmakers doubt a Congress that’s ‘barely capable of email’ can regulate AI
Some members of Congress are voicing doubts that the legislature is technically equipped to write meaningful artificial intelligence rules, with one lawmaker describing a Congress 'barely capable of email' as poorly placed to regulate the fast-moving technology. The comments add to a broader debate in Washington over whether federal lawmakers can keep pace with AI development, as committees hold hearings and debate possible safeguards while other countries move ahead with their own frameworks.
- 7China and US agree AI dialogue and tariff cuts●China, US agree to AI dialogue, tariff cuts on $30 billion in goods during Xi visit
China and the United States have agreed to open a dialogue on artificial intelligence and to cut tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods, in agreements reached during Xi Jinping's visit. The deal marks a rare moment of de-escalation between the two powers, combining cooperation on emerging technology with concrete steps to ease trade tensions that have strained both economies.
- 8
Commentators are arguing that media coverage of artificial intelligence focuses too much on speculative, science-fiction-style scenarios while ignoring the concrete harm generative AI is already causing to people today. The piece says society should not waste time fantasizing about distant risks and should instead address the real, present-day damage. The argument is fueling debate about how AI dangers should be framed.