search
federal judge
Trends
- 1
A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain journalists from White House press access. The decision restores press entry rights that had been revoked, and is being widely covered as a significant check on presidential authority over media access. Supporters of the ruling call it a win for press freedom, while critics of judicial intervention are expected to push back.
- 2Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's bid to overturn conviction●Judge rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's 'frivolous' attempt to overturn conviction
A federal judge has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's latest legal effort to overturn her conviction for aiding Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls, dismissing the attempt as frivolous. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction. The ruling closes off another avenue in her ongoing efforts to challenge the verdict from prison.
- 3CNN returns to White House after judge orders access restored●CNN back at WH after judge orders Trump admin to restore access
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore CNN's access to the White House, and the network's reporters are back on the premises. The ruling is being read as a check on the administration's efforts to penalize a major news outlet, with press freedom advocates welcoming the decision while the legal fight over media access continues.
- 4MS NOW reporter denied White House access despite court ruling●BREAKING: MS NOW reporter DENIED access to White House despite judge's ruling
A reporter for MS NOW was denied access to the White House even after a judge's ruling, according to the outlet's announcement. The development has drawn heavy attention online, with critics framing it as defiance of a federal court order and renewed debate over press freedom and the administration's handling of media credentials.
- 5Judge rules ICE sought to punish immigrants held in New York●Judge rules ICE sought to 'inflict punishment' on immigrants held in NY
A judge has ruled that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement sought to 'inflict punishment' on immigrants detained in New York. The decision finds that conditions or treatment at detention amounted to punishment rather than administrative custody, a violation of detainees' constitutional protections. The ruling adds to ongoing legal scrutiny of ICE detention practices and is likely to fuel debate over immigration enforcement under current policy.