federal courts

A US judge has ruled against President Trump's ban blocking certain media outlets from White House access, overturning the exclusion in a significant rebuke to the administration's press restrictions. The decision is drawing wide attention as a test of press freedom and presidential power, with the story among the most discussed news items globally.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision allows states conducting voter roll checks to access the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements records. Supporters frame it as a tool for election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could discourage eligible voters from registering and raise privacy concerns.

CNN has been allowed back into the White House after a federal judge paused the Trump administration's ban on the network from press access. The ruling temporarily blocks the administration from excluding CNN, restoring the network's ability to cover briefings and events. The dispute has drawn wide attention as a test of press freedom and the limits of presidential power over media access.

News organisations CNN, MS NOW and Politico have asked a federal judge to extend a court order blocking a White House ban affecting them. The filing asks that the existing block remain in place while the legal challenge proceeds, keeping the administration's restrictions on hold. The dispute is being closely watched as a test of press access and First Amendment protections.

A court has struck down conditions imposed by the Trump administration that tied anti-terrorism funding to election-related demands. The Brennan Center for Justice highlighted the ruling, which removes restrictions the administration had attached to grants meant to counter terrorism. The decision is being read as a rebuke of efforts to leverage federal security funding for electoral ends, and it restores access to the affected money for recipients.

Mexico has filed a lawsuit against Meta in federal court, accusing the company of human rights violations. News of the legal action, first reported by Milenio, has drawn significant attention as one of the most discussed stories internationally. The case marks a notable escalation between the Mexican government and the US tech giant, though the specific allegations behind the suit have not yet been detailed.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending case concerning climate change, meaning the justices will likely decide the matter with only eight members. His decision to recuse himself raises questions about how the court will handle a case with direct implications for federal climate policy.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to permit the government to limit such care while litigation over the policy continues, adding to a series of legal battles over transgender rights that have reached the nation's highest court.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it is not complying with a court order concerning press access. The development escalates a running legal dispute between the administration and news organisations over reporters' access to presidential events, and raises the prospect of further court action if the administration's response is deemed inadequate.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use a federal citizenship verification tool when checking whether people registering to vote are US citizens. The decision addresses concerns over noncitizen voting, but its practical effect is expected to be limited because changes come too close to the midterm elections to significantly alter voter rolls or procedures this cycle.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit court to strike down a drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized recording immigration enforcement agents from the air. The group argues the restriction blocks lawful First Amendment activity by preventing aerial documentation of immigration operations. The case is drawing attention from civil liberties advocates concerned about oversight of federal immigration agents.

The Bernalillo County Clerk in New Mexico says mail-in ballot operations are proceeding on schedule following a Supreme Court decision against a White House election plan. The clerk's assurance is meant to reassure local voters that ballot delivery and processing in New Mexico's most populous county will not be disrupted by the federal court outcome.

A federal court ruling could undermine Wisconsin's law prohibiting AI-generated child sexual abuse material. The decision raises questions about whether the state statute can survive legal scrutiny, and may prompt lawmakers to revise the law. Observers are watching closely because similar bans exist in other states and could face comparable challenges if courts find the Wisconsin measure legally flawed.

A federal court has ruled that Washington, D.C.'s parole and supervised release system discriminates against people with disabilities. The decision, highlighted by the ACLU of the District of Columbia, finds the system failed to accommodate disabled people under supervision. Advocates say the ruling could force reforms in how parole conditions and support services are administered across the capital's criminal justice system.

A federal court ruling has cleared a path for the opening of a Jewish charter school in Oklahoma, according to Education Week. The decision marks a significant development in the debate over religiously affiliated charter schools, which critics say violates church-state separation but supporters view as an expansion of school choice.

A federal court has ruled that prediction market operator Kalshi is subject to Tennessee's gambling laws in relation to its sports event contracts. The decision means Kalshi cannot treat its sports contracts as federally regulated financial products exempt from state gaming rules, and could face enforcement in Tennessee. The ruling is being watched closely as states increasingly challenge prediction markets offering sports wagering without state licenses.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a ruling with implications for the Pentagon's ability to restrict the firm's involvement in defense-related procurement. The decision settles a legal challenge to the designation and keeps Anthropic subject to the restrictions that come with it. The case is drawing attention because it pits national security concerns against one of the leading American artificial intelligence developers.

A federal judge has reinstated a $7 billion solar energy program serving low-income families that the Trump administration had scrapped. The ruling restores funding for the initiative for now, but an appeal is expected, meaning the program's future remains uncertain as the legal fight continues.

An Illinois court has ruled that the Illinois Interest Act, also known as the IFPA, is preempted as applied to federal credit unions. The decision extends existing preemption protections, meaning federally chartered credit unions in Illinois are not subject to the state law's interest rate caps and penalties. Consumer finance lawyers are watching the ruling, which could affect lending practices and further litigation over state usury rules applying to federally insured institutions.