federal court

A US judge has overturned President Trump's ban preventing certain media outlets from access to the White House. The ruling reaffirms press freedom protections, limiting the administration's ability to exclude journalists from presidential coverage. The decision is drawing wide attention as part of ongoing legal battles between the Trump administration and news organisations over access and First Amendment rights.

A federal judge has overturned the Trump administration's ban barring certain journalists from White House press access. The ruling restores entry privileges and has been widely covered by news outlets as a significant win for press freedom, with debate expected over whether the administration will appeal or comply with the decision.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows states to cross-check voter registration records against immigration data, a step several Republican-led states have sought as part of efforts to tighten election integrity rules. Critics argue the practice could disenfranchise eligible voters, while supporters say it safeguards the ballot.

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore CNN's access to the White House, and the network's reporters are back on the premises. The ruling is being read as a check on the administration's efforts to penalize a major news outlet, with press freedom advocates welcoming the decision while the legal fight over media access continues.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to verify voter citizenship using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters say protects election integrity and critics warn could purge eligible voters and discourage registration among naturalized citizens just before voting begins.

A federal judge has paused the Trump administration's move to bar CNN from the White House, allowing the network's reporters back into the building pending further legal proceedings. The case is part of a broader dispute between the administration and major news outlets over access to the president and press briefings, with press freedom groups closely watching the outcome.

Senator Susan Collins of Maine is running for re-election for the first time since she voted to confirm Supreme Court justices who went on to overturn federal abortion rights. Her role in shaping the court's conservative majority has become a central issue in the campaign, with abortion rights a mobilising topic for Maine voters and Democrats hoping to use it against her.

A federal court ruling requires Texas to install air conditioning in its prisons by 2029. The decision follows years of complaints and litigation over dangerously high temperatures inside state lockups, where heat has been blamed for deaths of inmates and staff. It marks one of the most significant mandates on prison conditions in the state.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized recording immigration agents from the air. Civil liberties advocates argue the rule blocks lawful documentation of federal immigration enforcement operations. The case has drawn attention amid ongoing disputes over the public's right to film government agents carrying out arrests and deportations.

A federal judge appointed by President Trump has held the Department of Homeland Security in contempt after an asylum seeker was deported twice despite active court orders blocking removal. The ruling underscores judicial frustration with immigration authorities disregarding judicial instructions, and is likely to fuel debate over compliance with court orders in deportation cases and the treatment of asylum seekers.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, according to CNBC. The ruling keeps in place a classification with potential implications for the company's ability to work with federal agencies, including the Pentagon. The decision is drawing attention as it touches on how Washington assesses security risks from major artificial intelligence firms.

Federal prosecutors have charged the owner of a semi-truck business over an alleged $105 million investment fraud scheme. Federal charges were announced in the case, though details of the alleged scheme, the accused's name, and the court involved have not yet been disclosed. The case adds to a string of recent federal prosecutions targeting investment fraud in the transportation sector.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision, reported by AP News and NewsNation, allows the administration to continue the programme while legal challenges proceed. The database is intended to check voter eligibility, and critics and supporters are weighing its implications for election administration and voter access.

A federal appeals court for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that Ohio can move ahead with regulating Kalshi's sports event contracts, a decision with implications for the fast-growing market in prediction and event-based trading. The ruling signals that state gambling regulators may have authority over such contracts, a outcome being watched closely by both prediction market platforms and state regulators nationwide.

A federal appeals court has sided with Hawaii's requirement that gun permit applicants complete the process within a set window and submit to inspection mandates. The ruling keeps in place provisions that gun rights advocates have challenged as burdensome, while state officials argue they are necessary for public safety. The decision is likely to fuel ongoing legal battles over the reach of Second Amendment protections following recent Supreme Court rulings on firearms rights.

Prediction market operator Kalshi has lost a ruling at the appeals court level concerning whether state regulators can oversee its prediction markets. The decision means states may retain authority to regulate or restrict certain event contracts, a setback for Kalshi's argument that federal law preempts state oversight of its business. The ruling is likely to shape ongoing disputes between prediction market platforms and state gaming and securities regulators.

The Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning the Department of Homeland Security's voter database, and officials have confirmed it will have no impact on California's 2026 general election. The decision resolves questions about whether federal voter data access could affect how the state runs its elections. California's electoral procedures for 2026 will proceed as planned.

A court decision could lead to new protections for rare species in California's Sierra Nevada, according to reporting by the Plumas Sun. The ruling may affect how rare plants and animals in the region are safeguarded under state or federal law. Details of the ruling and which species stand to gain protection have not been specified in the available reporting.