election judges

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Trump administration cannot withhold FEMA antiterrorism preparedness grants from states based on changes to their election procedures. The decision stops the administration from using federal security funding as leverage over how states run elections. The case stems from conditions placed on grants meant to help states prepare for terrorism and other emergencies.

Champaign County officials are warning that some polling locations may have to close because not enough people have signed up to serve as election judges. Voters in the Illinois county could face longer travel or consolidated sites in upcoming elections unless more residents volunteer to staff the polls before the deadline.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the authority to extend voting hours at polling places, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling on judicial power over polling hours will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, leaving election procedures unchanged for now.

A federal judge has blocked rules from the Federal Emergency Management Agency that tied election-related requirements to anti-terrorism grant funding. The ruling stops the agency from attaching those conditions to security grants, a decision that affects how states and local governments receive and use federal money intended to protect elections and public safety. The full reasoning behind the order and any next steps, including possible appeals, are not yet detailed in available reporting.

A federal judge has blocked FEMA from conditioning counterterrorism grant funds for states on adopting election reforms. The ruling means states can keep receiving emergency security money without facing pressure over voting rules. The decision lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over whether federal agencies can tie funding to state election administration changes.

A federal judge has stopped the Trump administration from making homeland security terrorism-prevention grants conditional on states or cities adopting election-related changes. The ruling blocks the administration from using federal security funding as leverage over local election rules, a move critics called coercive. The decision is likely to be cited in ongoing legal fights over presidential power and election administration.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but will not take up the case until after the November election. The timing means the question of judicial authority over voting hours will remain unresolved during the upcoming vote, drawing attention from election watchers concerned about how disputes at the polls would be handled this year.

The 2026 elections for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest criminal court, are drawing attention to which judges and candidates will compete for seats on the nine-member bench. Coverage is laying out the declared candidates, the seats up for grabs, and what the races could mean for criminal justice policy in Texas ahead of the primary and general elections.