search
election judges
Trends
- 1Supreme Court debates Election Commission's perceived independence●सिर्फ स्वतंत्र होना नहीं, दिखना भी जरूरी... Election Commission पर Supreme Court में क्या बहस हुई?
During a Supreme Court hearing in India, judges examined the Election Commission's independence, with the observation that being independent is not enough — the Commission must also be seen as independent. The remarks have sparked discussion about the appointment process and public trust in India's electoral body.
- 2
A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to make states adopt election-related changes as a condition for receiving anti-terrorism grant funding. The decision stops the administration from withholding homeland security money to pressure states over election policy. It is the latest judicial setback to White House efforts to link federal funding to its political priorities.
- 3Judge rules FEMA cannot tie security grants to election changes▼FEMA can’t condition security grants on election changes, judge says
A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot condition security grant funding on states making changes to their election systems. The decision limits FEMA's ability to use homeland security grants as leverage over election policy, a move that had raised concerns about federal overreach into state-administered elections.
- 4Judge blocks feds from withholding security funds over election rules▼Feds can't withhold counterterrorism funds from states to force election admin changes, judge rules
A federal judge ruled that the federal government cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states in order to pressure them into changing how they run elections. The decision limits the use of homeland security grants as leverage over state election administration, reinforcing that states control their own election systems and that such funds cannot be conditioned on unrelated policy demands.
- 5Trump bid to cut state anti-terror funds draws election rigging claims●Republicans trying everything they can to try to rig the mid-term elections speaks volumes about where the real threat t
A judge has struck down President Donald Trump's bid to cut states' anti-terror funds unless they imposed new conditions. Critics, including commentators on the political left, frame this and related Republican actions as attempts to rig the midterm elections, arguing the party's conduct reveals where the real threat to elections, voting, and democracy lies.
- 6Judge blocks Trump administration from tying anti-terror grants to election security▼Trump administration cannot tie anti-terrorism grants to election security, judge rules
A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot condition anti-terrorism grants on election security measures. The decision limits the administration's ability to use federal funding as leverage over state and local governments on election-related policy. The ruling is drawing attention amid ongoing debates over federal power, election administration, and the allocation of homeland security money.
- 7Judge Blocks FEMA From Tying Antiterrorism Grants to Election Changes●Judge Blocks FEMA From Tying Antiterrorism Grants to Election Changes https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/climate/fema-gr
A federal judge has blocked the Federal Emergency Management Agency from conditioning antiterrorism grants on changes to election practices. The ruling stops the agency from using homeland security funding as leverage over how states run their elections, a move critics said would blur the line between disaster and security funding and election administration. The decision is likely to be appealed and fuels ongoing legal fights over federal conditions on state election rules.
- 8Judge Blocks US From Tying Emergency Grants to Election Changes▼Judge Blocks U.S. From Tying Emergency Grants to Election Changes
A federal judge has blocked the US government from making emergency grants conditional on states or localities changing their election procedures. The ruling stops federal officials from using pandemic-related or emergency funding as leverage to impose voting rule changes. The decision is being reported by major outlets including the New York Times and touches on ongoing debates over federal power and election administration.
- 9
A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency cannot condition antiterrorism grant funding on states making changes to their election systems. The decision stops the agency from using security grants as leverage over election administration. The ruling is being closely watched amid ongoing disputes over federal authority over state-run elections.
- 10Judge rules Trump cannot block counterterrorism funds to force election changes●Trump can’t force election changes by blocking counterterrorism funds to states, judge says
A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot withhold counterterrorism funding from states as a way to force changes to election procedures. The decision blocks an attempt to pressure states through federal homeland security grants. The ruling limits the administration's use of funding conditions to influence how states run elections.
- 11Judge blocks Trump bid to tie anti-terror funds to voting rules▼Judge strikes down Trump’s bid to cut states’ anti-terror funds unless they impose new voting restrictions
A federal judge has struck down the Trump administration's attempt to withhold states' anti-terrorism funding unless they adopt new voting restrictions. The ruling blocks the administration from conditioning federal security grants on changes to state election rules, a move critics called coercive and unlawful. Supporters of voting rights groups have welcomed the decision, while the administration could still appeal, keeping the fight over federal leverage on election policy alive.
- 12Cook County hires election judges ahead of Illinois midterms▼Cook County hiring election judges, Illinois prepares poll monitors ahead of Nov. 3 midterm election
Cook County is recruiting election judges while Illinois prepares poll monitors ahead of the November 3 midterm election. Officials in the state are ramping up staffing and oversight measures to run polling places smoothly, and the effort is drawing attention as election administration becomes a closely watched issue nationwide.
- 13High School Students Urged to Apply as Election Judges▼High school students encouraged to apply to be an election judge
Local election officials are encouraging high school students to apply to serve as election judges. The push, reported by WGEM, aims to bring younger poll workers into the election process, typically offering students hands-on civic experience and sometimes pay or school credit. Similar recruitment efforts have grown as many jurisdictions face shortages of poll workers ahead of upcoming elections.