search
US justice
Trends
- 1Commentary says Roberts court is reviving Jim Crow-era discriminationโJim Crow was on the ash heap of history. Then came the Roberts court.
Mother Jones argues that the US Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts has dismantled legal protections that had consigned Jim Crow segregation to history. The piece frames recent rulings as rolling back civil rights-era gains, prompting debate over the court's treatment of voting rights and racial discrimination law.
- 2Justice Alito Recuses Himself From Major Climate CaseโJustice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate-Change Case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard. The move leaves the court shorthanded on a contested environmental matter and will fuel questions about the reasons for the recusal and its possible impact on the outcome.
- 3
New United States sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being framed as a threat to European sovereignty, according to analysis published by IOPlus. The measures could expose European officials and organisations cooperating with the Hague-based court to penalties, raising concerns in Europe about judicial independence and the reach of American foreign policy. Critics argue the move pressures allies and undermines international justice institutions.
- 4Justice Alito recuses from landmark Supreme Court climate caseโSupreme Court Justice Alito steps aside from landmark climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has removed himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to US media reports. The recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. The reason for his stepping aside has not been detailed in the initial reports.
- 5Supreme court lets US resume third-country deportationsโUS supreme court allows Trump officials to resume deportations to third countries
The US supreme court has allowed the Trump administration to resume deportations of migrants to third countries, lifting a lower-court ruling that had blocked the practice. The decision came on a temporary basis from the court's conservative majority, while the three liberal justices dissented, expressing concern over sending people to countries where they have no ties.
- 6Supreme Court allows swift third-country deportations to resumeโ# SCOTUS lets quick # deportations to third countries resume for now while it weighs # Trump policy # law # immigration
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for rapid deportations of migrants to third countries to continue while it considers the legality of the Trump administration's policy. The interim decision lifts a lower-court pause, letting officials remove people to countries they are not from without lengthy review. Critics have condemned the move as circumventing due process, with commentary describing it as an 'activist' or 'partisan' court, while the case remains pending before the justices.
- 7Supreme Court allows Trump third-country deportations to continueโSupreme Court lets Trump continue deporting people to 3rd countries while justices consider policy
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue deporting migrants to third countries while the justices consider the legality of the policy. The decision is an interim move, allowing removals to proceed during ongoing litigation. The practice of sending migrants to countries other than their own has drawn sharp criticism from rights groups and remains under review by the Court.
- 8Supreme Court opens new term with major environmental caseโSupreme Court to start new term with major environmental case
The US Supreme Court is set to begin its new term with a significant environmental case on its docket. The National Constitution Center highlighted the case as the term's marquee opening matter, drawing attention to how the justices may shape federal environmental regulation. Observers are watching closely for signals on the Court's approach to agency power and climate-related disputes.
- 9Supreme Court to review judges' power to extend polling hoursโSupreme Court to consider judges' powers to extend polling hours - but not until after November election
The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but will hear the matter only after the November election. The timing means the question will not affect voting in the upcoming contest, even as concerns about polling place disruptions and election administration remain prominent. Election officials, courts and voting rights groups are watching closely for how the justices define judicial authority over voting hours in future elections.
- 10Supreme Court Clears Trump to Resume Third-Country DeportationsโSupreme Court Clears Trump to Resume Third-Country Deportations as Justices Take Up Legal Fight
The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to resume deportations of migrants to third countries while justices consider the underlying legal challenge. The interim ruling lifts, for now, lower-court obstacles to the policy, which sends deportees to nations other than their country of origin. The move intensifies debate over immigration enforcement and the limits of presidential power as the case proceeds.
- 11Justice Alito sits out Supreme Court climate change caseโJustice Alito makes last-minute decision to sit out climate change case
US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has made a last-minute decision to recuse himself from a pending climate change case, according to an ABA Journal report. The timing of the withdrawal is notable, as the remaining eight justices will decide the outcome without him, potentially raising questions about how the court will split on the issue.
- 12Supreme Court allows third-country deportations to continueโJustices allow third-country deportations as case proceeds
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue deportations to third countries while a legal challenge proceeds in lower courts. The justices allowed the removals to go ahead without blocking them in the interim, a significant procedural win for the administration as litigation over the policy's legality continues.