US justice

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-change case just days before it was due to be heard. The move leaves the court shorthanded on a contested environmental matter and will fuel questions about the reasons for the recusal and its possible impact on the outcome.

The Wall Street Journal reports on how a lawyer with a background in business litigation has come to lead the Justice Department's efforts against gender-affirming care for transgender people. The profile examines his career path and role in shaping federal policy on transgender medical care, a flashpoint issue in US politics.

A group of immigrants is asking the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb protections that currently keep them from being removed to nations other than their home countries while the case continues.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has removed himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to US media reports. The recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. The reason for his stepping aside has not been detailed in the initial reports.

A UN news roundup highlights US migration policies triggering what officials call a cascade of human rights violations, alongside warnings over funding shortfalls for refugee programmes. The brief also covers a new global report on the state of the world's forests and progress on restorative justice efforts in Colombia as the country continues dealing with the legacy of its armed conflict.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending climate change case, according to multiple US news outlets. No reason for his recusal was given in the reports. His absence could affect the outcome of the case, which is seen as pivotal for climate-related litigation and regulation in the United States.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending climate change case before the court. The announcement, reported by SCOTUSblog, removes one justice from a dispute with potential consequences for climate regulation, leaving eight justices to decide the outcome. Reasons for the withdrawal were not stated in the report.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate case amid scrutiny over his holdings in oil stocks. The decision removes him from proceedings with potentially far-reaching consequences for climate regulation, and it has renewed debate over the ethical standards and financial disclosure rules governing Supreme Court justices.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move comes amid scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest surrounding the justice. The reversal is drawing attention to ethical questions facing the Supreme Court and to the stakes of the climate litigation, which could have significant consequences for environmental regulation in the United States.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.

The US Department of Justice has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals for election-related crimes. The announcement was made via the department's official website, though details of the specific offenses, the defendants' identities and the sentences involved have not yet been widely circulated. The case comes amid ongoing national scrutiny of election integrity and enforcement of voting laws.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the court's consideration of the Suncor climate liability case, which involves Colorado communities suing the energy company over climate change damages. The move leaves eight justices to decide whether to hear the dispute, and is drawing attention because of questions over Alito's financial disclosures and ties to energy interests.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not hear a major case that could affect his personal investments in oil and gas companies. The decision means the case will go forward without him, leaving the remaining eight justices to decide an issue in which Alito holds a disclosed financial stake.

The Department of Justice has filed charges against additional Pennsylvania residents accused of voting despite not being US citizens, part of a wider enforcement push. The move follows earlier prosecutions in the state and comes amid heightened national scrutiny of voter eligibility rules ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue deporting migrants to third countries while the justices consider the legality of the policy. The decision is an interim move, allowing removals to proceed during ongoing litigation. The practice of sending migrants to countries other than their own has drawn sharp criticism from rights groups and remains under review by the Court.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for rapid deportations of migrants to third countries to continue while it considers the legality of the Trump administration's policy. The interim decision lifts a lower-court pause, letting officials remove people to countries they are not from without lengthy review. Critics have condemned the move as circumventing due process, with commentary describing it as an 'activist' or 'partisan' court, while the case remains pending before the justices.

The US supreme court has allowed the Trump administration to resume deportations of migrants to third countries, lifting a lower-court ruling that had blocked the practice. The decision came on a temporary basis from the court's conservative majority, while the three liberal justices dissented, expressing concern over sending people to countries where they have no ties.

A look back at American lawyer Ben Ferencz, who at 27 served as chief prosecutor in the Einsatzgruppen trial at Nuremberg, which opened on 29 September 1947 and has been called the biggest murder trial in history. He brought 22 Nazi death squad leaders to justice and later recalled that none of the defendants showed any remorse for their roles in mass killings.

The US Supreme Court is set to begin its new term with a significant environmental case on its docket. The National Constitution Center highlighted the case as the term's marquee opening matter, drawing attention to how the justices may shape federal environmental regulation. Observers are watching closely for signals on the Court's approach to agency power and climate-related disputes.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has made a last-minute decision to recuse himself from a pending climate change case, according to an ABA Journal report. The timing of the withdrawal is notable, as the remaining eight justices will decide the outcome without him, potentially raising questions about how the court will split on the issue.

The US Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to resume deportations of migrants to third countries while justices consider the underlying legal challenge. The interim ruling lifts, for now, lower-court obstacles to the policy, which sends deportees to nations other than their country of origin. The move intensifies debate over immigration enforcement and the limits of presidential power as the case proceeds.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the power to extend polling hours, but will hear the matter only after the November election. The timing means the question will not affect voting in the upcoming contest, even as concerns about polling place disruptions and election administration remain prominent. Election officials, courts and voting rights groups are watching closely for how the justices define judicial authority over voting hours in future elections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue deportations to third countries while a legal challenge proceeds in lower courts. The justices allowed the removals to go ahead without blocking them in the interim, a significant procedural win for the administration as litigation over the policy's legality continues.

Kurt Olsen, an attorney known for promoting claims that the 2020 election was stolen, has left the Department of Justice after failing to uncover evidence of election fraud. Coverage by Democracy Docket highlights the departure as the latest setback for efforts to substantiate stolen-election allegations. The move has drawn attention given Olsen's prominent role in pushing unfounded election conspiracy claims.

The US Supreme Court is opening its new term with a high-stakes case that commentators say will be a major test for its conservative majority. Slate argues the term-opening blockbuster will test the conservative justices like no other case, given the Court's 6-3 conservative bench and its recent willingness to reshape precedent. The case is expected to draw intense national attention as arguments begin.

Justice Samuel Alito's last-minute decision has altered a high-stakes Supreme Court fight over climate regulation. The exact nature of his move was not specified, but it comes as the Court weighs a case with major consequences for environmental policy. Observers are watching closely, since any shift by one justice could shape the outcome of the showdown.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for deportations of migrants to third countries while agreeing to hear arguments on the policy's legality. The decision allows the government to continue removing people to countries other than their own in the interim, with the case to be fully argued before the justices later, keeping the practice in place for now.