US courts

A US judge has rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's latest attempt to overturn her conviction, dismissing the effort as 'frivolous'. Maxwell, the former associate of Jeffrey Epstein, is serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking offences. The ruling keeps her conviction intact and closes off another avenue of appeal in a case that continues to draw global attention.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters or voter registration applicants. The decision allows states to cross-check voter rolls against federal immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity enforcement and critics warn could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly purged from voter lists.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration can temporarily use its revamped federal voter eligibility database while legal challenges continue. The decision clears the way for federal officials to cross-check voter rolls against the new system in the interim. News outlets including AP News and NewsNation report the ruling as an interim measure, not a final resolution of the dispute over the database.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it blocked Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map for the third time. The rebuke highlights growing tension between Trump and a court that includes three justices he appointed, amid ongoing fights over redistricting ahead of upcoming elections. The dispute is drawing attention to how far the justices will go in shaping electoral maps favored by Republican legislatures.

The US Supreme Court has issued a rare 9-0 unanimous decision that commentators say carries significant nationwide and constitutional implications. Details of the specific case are not provided, but unanimous rulings of this kind often signal broad agreement among all nine justices on a legal question affecting the whole country.

A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention, and his case is being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on prolonged immigration detention. The case, covered by El Paso Matters, raises questions about how long immigrants can be held while challenging deportation, and how the high court's decision is applied in practice.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration to resume citizenship checks on voters, lifting an earlier barrier to the policy. The move is expected to intensify the ongoing political fight over voting access, with supporters framing it as protecting election integrity and critics warning it could suppress legitimate voters.

The US Supreme Court has allowed expanded voter-citizenship verification checks to resume ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling means election officials can restart more extensive screening of voter registrations while related legal challenges continue. The decision is drawing attention from voting-rights groups and election officials concerned about its impact on eligible voters before the midterms.

Donald Trump publicly criticized the US Supreme Court after it declined for a third time to reinstate a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri. The justices' repeated rejections leave the GOP map blocked, and Trump's rebuke has sharpened tensions between the president and a court dominated by his own appointees. Commentators are weighing what the clash means for redistricting fights and for the court's independence.

Donald Trump has criticised the US Supreme Court after it declined to back Missouri's congressional map, which critics said was drawn to favour Republicans. The rebuke puts fresh attention on the fight over gerrymandering ahead of upcoming elections and highlights tensions between Trump and a court shaped by his own appointees.

The Trump administration is intensifying efforts against the International Criminal Court, preparing new sanctions as part of a broader push to undermine the Hague-based tribunal. The move follows earlier sanctions imposed on court officials and escalates a long-running dispute over the ICC's investigations touching US allies and personnel.

A federal judge has denied a request to block Highway Patrol traffic stops carried out in coordination with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The ruling allows the joint enforcement operations to continue while related legal challenges proceed. Critics of the practice argue it leads to racial profiling and improper immigration stops during routine traffic enforcement, while supporters back cooperation between state and federal agencies.

Virginia Democrats have filed a request with the US Supreme Court seeking to override a state court decision that struck down the state's redistricting plan. The dispute centers on who holds final authority over Virginia's electoral maps, with Democrats arguing the state ruling should not stand. The case adds to ongoing national battles over congressional and legislative district boundaries heading into upcoming elections.

A US appeals court has upheld the Pentagon's decision to place AI company Anthropic under a heightened risk designation. The ruling keeps in place the Defense Department's assessment of potential risks tied to the firm's artificial intelligence work. The decision is drawing attention as governments weigh oversight of leading AI developers and their role in sensitive defense-related contexts.

A court ruling is affecting Missouri's congressional district boundaries, with potential consequences for how the state's seats are drawn and which party holds an advantage in future elections. Details of the decision and its immediate impact on the map remain limited, but redistricting disputes in Missouri carry significance for control of the US House.

A former US Marine accused of murder in a 2016 case is due to appear in court in San Diego. Details of the hearing and the charges have not been widely reported beyond local coverage, with NBC 7 San Diego noting the scheduled appearance. The case's revival after several years is drawing local attention.

Jacobin argues that Congress, not the Supreme Court, bears responsibility for the failures of US lawmaking. The piece contends that progressives too often blame judicial rulings for policy gridlock that stems from legislators' own unwillingness or inability to pass bold legislation. The argument feeds a broader debate on the American left about where to direct blame for stalled priorities.