MikeTrendsTrends right now

search

US Supreme Court

Trends

  1. 1
    Supreme Court Strikes Down Most Trump Tariffsโ—Supreme Court invalidates most of Trump's tariffsโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of President Trump's tariffs, invalidating most of the import duties imposed under his trade agenda. The decision marks a major legal setback for the administration's economic policy and is set to reshape US trade relations, with reactions pouring in from lawmakers, businesses and trading partners worldwide.

  2. 2
    Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for citizenship checksโ—Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checksYhnWorldElections7841 min ago

    The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, in a decision reported by CyberScoop. The ruling lets states tap the immigration-status system as part of voter roll checks, a move likely to intensify debate over election integrity measures and the treatment of eligible citizens during verification.

  3. 3
    Supreme Court rejects attempt to restrict mail-in votingโ—Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in votingโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting. The decision blocks efforts to impose limits on the use of mailed ballots, preserving broader access to absentee voting for now. The ruling touches one of the most contested issues in American election policy, following years of litigation over voting rules.

  4. 4
    Supreme Court ruling shakes up election landscapeโ—BOMBSHELL: Supreme Court UPENDS election with SHOCK RULINGโ–ถyoutubeWorldLaw & Courts793.2K41 min ago

    A surprise ruling from the US Supreme Court is being described as upending the election, with legal commentators and advocacy groups reacting to the decision. The ruling has drawn heavy attention from commentators like Brian Tyler Cohen and voting rights organization Democracy Docket, who frame it as a major development in election law.

  5. 5
    Trump presses Congress to end birthright citizenship after Supreme Court rulingโ—Trump says 'too bad' SCOTUS upheld birthright citizenship, pushes legislation to end itโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing for legislation to end the practice. The former president has long sought to eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the US to non-citizens, and is calling on lawmakers to act where the courts would not.

  6. 6
    Supreme Court rulings could shape midterm electionsโ–ผHow new Supreme Court rulings could impact midterm electionsโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    US news outlets are examining how recent Supreme Court decisions may influence the upcoming midterm elections. Coverage from stations including KCRA and KOCO focuses on the potential electoral consequences of the rulings, particularly how they could mobilize voters and shape campaign messaging for both parties heading into the vote.

  7. 7
    Supreme Court Accused of Inviting More Election Chaosโ–ผThe Supreme Court Is Inviting More Election Chaosโœ‰newsWorldElections41 min ago

    A Bloomberg editorial argues that the US Supreme Court is inviting more chaos into future American elections, criticizing recent judicial decisions on election-related questions. The piece contends the Court's handling of election disputes leaves rules unsettled and encourages further litigation and conflict. Critics and commentators are weighing in on the Court's role in shaping electoral outcomes and procedure.

  8. 8
    Supreme Court Issues Unanimous 9-0 Ruling With Constitutional Impactโ—Supreme Court Delivers 9-0 Unanimous Ruling With Major Nationwide & Constitutional Implications!โ–ถyoutubeWorldLaw & Courts511.1K2 h ago

    The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 decision that commentators say carries major nationwide and constitutional implications. The ruling's specifics are not detailed in available reporting, but the unanimity itself is being highlighted as significant, since a fully unified Court often signals broad agreement on questions of law with effects reaching well beyond the individual case.

  9. 9
    Supreme Court issues surprise Friday night rulingโ—BREAKING: Supreme Court drops BOMBSHELL FRIDAY NIGHT rulingโ–ถyoutubeWorldLaw & Courts393.5K2 h ago

    The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released on a Friday night, an unusual timing that immediately drew heavy attention and reaction online. The content and implications of the decision were not specified in the initial reports, and legal observers were quick to weigh in on what the late-week release could signal about the case.

  10. 10
    Commentary argues Roberts court is reviving Jim Crow-era policiesโ–ผJim Crow was on the ash heap of history. Then came the Roberts court.โœ‰newsWorldPolitics49 min ago

    Mother Jones argues that Jim Crow segregation, long considered relegated to history, is being revived through decisions by the US Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts. The piece frames recent rulings by the Roberts court as dismantling civil rights protections built after the segregation era, prompting debate over the court's direction on race and voting rights.

  11. 11
    Supreme Court blocks GOP-favored Missouri congressional map againโ—Supreme Court blocks use of GOP-favored map in Missouri โ€” againโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, rejecting the state's redrawn district boundaries. It is at least the second time the justices have intervened over the map. The ruling reignites debate over partisan gerrymandering and voting rights, with Republicans in Missouri pushing for districts that favor their party and critics welcoming the court's refusal to allow the map to stand.

  12. 12
    California Supreme Court Orders Sheriff to Return 650,000 Seized Ballotsโ—California Supreme Court Rules Sheriff Illegally Seized 650,000 Ballots, Orders Their Returnโœ‰newsWorldLaw & Courts41 min ago

    The California Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff acted illegally when he seized roughly 650,000 ballots, and has ordered that they be returned. The decision is being covered internationally, including in Ukrainian-language media, and is expected to intensify debate over election security, law enforcement authority, and the handling of ballots in a US election.