search
US Supreme Court
Trends
- 1Supreme Court Strikes Down Most of Trump's Tariffs▼Supreme Court invalidates most of Trump's tariffs
The US Supreme Court has ruled against the bulk of tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating most of the trade duties his administration put in place. The decision represents a major legal setback for the president's trade policy and removes a central pillar of his economic agenda. Details of the ruling's reasoning and next steps are still emerging.
- 2Supreme Court allows states to use SAVE database for voter citizenship checks●Supreme Court permits states to use SAVE database for citizenship checks
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters. The decision allows states to cross-check voter registration records against immigration data, a step several Republican-led states have sought as part of efforts to tighten election integrity rules. Critics argue the practice could disenfranchise eligible voters, while supporters say it safeguards the ballot.
- 3Supreme Court allows state bans on transgender girls in school sports●Supreme Court upholds state bans on transgender girls in girls' sports
The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.
- 4Supreme Court again blocks Missouri congressional map favoring Republicans●For the third time, Supreme Court declines to allow Missouri to use congressional map expected to aid Republicans
The US Supreme Court has for the third time declined to let Missouri put in place a new congressional map expected to help Republicans win more House seats. The order leaves the map on hold while litigation continues, and it marks repeated refusals by the justices to intervene on the state's behalf, keeping the redrawn districts out of use for now.
- 5
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.
- 6Supreme Court Clears Use of Immigration Database for Voter Checks●Supreme Court Says Trump Officials Can Use Immigration Database for Voter Checks
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.
- 7Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks Before Midterms●Supreme Court Allows Voter Citizenship Checks via SAVE Database Before Midterms
The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to verify voter citizenship using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters say protects election integrity and critics warn could purge eligible voters and discourage registration among naturalized citizens just before voting begins.
- 8Supreme Court rejects attempt to restrict mail-in voting●Supreme Court rejects Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting
The US Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's attempt to restrict mail-in voting. The decision blocks efforts to impose limits on the use of mailed ballots, preserving broader access to absentee voting for now. The ruling touches one of the most contested issues in American election policy, following years of litigation over voting rules.
- 9Supreme Court Lets States Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks●Supreme Court Allows States to Use SAVE Database for Voter Citizenship Checks
The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voter registrants. The decision permits state election officials to cross-check registration records against federal immigration data. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting rights groups warn it could lead to eligible citizens being wrongly removed from voter rolls, particularly naturalised Americans.
- 10New Supreme Court rulings could shape midterm elections▼How new Supreme Court rulings could impact midterm elections
Recent Supreme Court decisions are being examined for their potential influence on the upcoming US midterm elections. News outlets including KCRA and KOCO are covering how the rulings could affect campaign issues, voter mobilization, and which seats are contested. Analysts suggest the Court's positions on key legal questions may become a focal point for both parties heading into the elections.
- 11Supreme Court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for midterms●Supreme court blocks Trump-backed Missouri congressional map from use in midterms
The US Supreme Court has blocked a Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional districts from being used in the upcoming midterm elections. The ruling stops the new map, which critics said was designed to entrench Republican advantage, from taking effect. The decision is a setback for Trump and Missouri Republicans who pushed the redistricting effort, and it keeps the existing district boundaries in place for the midterms.
- 12Trump pushes legislation to end birthright citizenship after Supreme Court ruling▼Trump says 'too bad' SCOTUS upheld birthright citizenship, pushes legislation to end it
Donald Trump said 'too bad' after the US Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, and is now pushing Congress to pass legislation to end the practice. His comments reignite a long-running fight over the 14th Amendment, which has repeatedly been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to anyone born on US soil. Critics say ending it would require a constitutional amendment, not a law.
- 13Supreme Court ruling shakes up election landscape●BOMBSHELL: Supreme Court UPENDS election with SHOCK RULING
A surprise ruling from the US Supreme Court is being described as upending the election, with legal commentators and advocacy groups reacting to the decision. The ruling has drawn heavy attention from commentators like Brian Tyler Cohen and voting rights organization Democracy Docket, who frame it as a major development in election law.
- 14Supreme Court Issues Unanimous 9-0 Ruling With Constitutional Impact●Supreme Court Delivers 9-0 Unanimous Ruling With Major Nationwide & Constitutional Implications!
The US Supreme Court has issued a unanimous 9-0 ruling that commentators describe as carrying major nationwide and constitutional implications. The decision, as characterized in coverage of the ruling, is significant both for its broad legal reach and for the rare display of complete agreement among all nine justices on a constitutional question.
- 15Supreme Court Accused of Inviting More Election Chaos▼The Supreme Court Is Inviting More Election Chaos
Commentary from Bloomberg argues that the US Supreme Court's recent actions are inviting more chaos into future American elections. The piece suggests the court's interventions in election-related disputes could deepen uncertainty and political conflict rather than resolve it. Critics warn the rulings may fuel further legal battles and public distrust in the electoral process heading into upcoming votes.
- 16Supreme Court allows Trump voter eligibility database for now▼Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for now
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, use its revamped federal voter eligibility database. The decision, reported by AP News and NewsNation, allows the administration to continue the programme while legal challenges proceed. The database is intended to check voter eligibility, and critics and supporters are weighing its implications for election administration and voter access.
- 17Cuban man's year in ICE detention tests Supreme Court ruling●A year in ICE detention: Cuban man’s case tests Supreme Court detention ruling
A Cuban man has spent a year in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in El Paso, and his case is now being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on immigration detention. The report examines how long the government can hold people and what the ruling means for others in similar situations.
- 18
The US Supreme Court has blocked the Trump-backed Republican redraw of Missouri's congressional map, halting new district boundaries that were set to reshape the state's US House delegation. The decision pauses the map while legal challenges proceed, a significant setback for Republicans who pushed the redrawing to gain an extra congressional seat.
- 19Supreme Court allows use of Social Security data to flag noncitizen voters▼Government can use Social Security data to identify noncitizen voters, Supreme Court rules
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.
- 20
The US Supreme Court has blocked for the third time a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, halting its use while litigation continues. The repeated interventions keep the state's district lines in flux heading into upcoming elections, and the ruling is drawing attention from voting-rights advocates and Republican lawmakers who spar over partisan gerrymandering and the court's role in election map disputes.
- 21Supreme Court issues surprise Friday night ruling●BREAKING: Supreme Court drops BOMBSHELL FRIDAY NIGHT ruling
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling that was released unexpectedly on a Friday evening, a practice often used for consequential decisions that attract less immediate attention. The decision is drawing heavy public reaction, with commentators urging people to pay close attention to what the justices decided and its implications for US law.
- 22Supreme Court signals path to weaken voter purge protections●In SAVE ruling, Supreme Court signals path to weaken key protection against last-minute purges
The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.
- 23Supreme Court rejects Republicans' Missouri redistricting push for third time▼Supreme Court rejects Republicans’ Missouri redistricting push for third time
The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican bid to redraw Missouri's congressional map, rejecting the push for the third time. The repeated denials leave the state's current district boundaries in place, despite continued efforts by state Republicans to redraw them to their advantage. The decision is drawing attention amid broader national fights over partisan gerrymandering and redistricting.
- 24Supreme Court Rejects Republicans' Missouri Redistricting Push Again▼US Supreme Court Rejects Republicans’ Missouri Redistricting Push for Third Time
The US Supreme Court has refused, for the third time, to take up a Republican effort to redraw Missouri's congressional district maps. The decision leaves the state's current district boundaries in place and marks the latest setback for Republicans seeking to reshape congressional representation in Missouri ahead of upcoming elections.
- 25Supreme Court blocks Missouri gerrymandered map for midterms▼In a win for voters, Supreme Court blocks Missouri’s gerrymandered map for midterms
The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map from being used in the upcoming midterm elections, a move celebrated by voting rights advocates as a win for voters. The decision means the contested district boundaries will not take effect while the legal fight over the map continues, raising fresh questions about how Missouri's seats will be drawn ahead of the vote.
- 26Supreme Court again blocks Missouri's gerrymandered congressional map●US Supreme Court again blocks Missouri’s gerrymandered congressional map
The US Supreme Court has once again halted the implementation of Missouri's Republican-drawn congressional map, refusing for a second time to let the districts take effect while legal challenges proceed. The map, redrawn after the 2020 census, has been challenged in state courts as an improper partisan gerrymander. The ruling leaves congressional district boundaries in Missouri unresolved, with the state's districts remaining under the previous lines for now.
- 27
The US Supreme Court has reinstated the Trump administration's large-scale voter verification system, allowing election officials to resume mass checks of voter registration data. The decision revives a contested policy that critics said risked purging eligible voters, while supporters argue it protects election integrity. The ruling is expected to shape voting-rights disputes ahead of upcoming elections.
- 28Supreme Court ends Missouri redistricting fight against GOP●Supreme Court shuts down Missouri redistricting saga in final rebuff to GOP
The US Supreme Court has declined to intervene in Missouri's redistricting dispute, delivering a final defeat to Republican efforts to redraw the state's congressional maps. The move closes out the litigation saga, leaving the existing district boundaries in place. The ruling is being read as another rebuff to GOP map-drawing ambitions nationwide, coming amid ongoing battles over congressional redistricting in several states ahead of future elections.
- 29Supreme Court blocks Missouri's Republican-favored congressional map●Surprisingly # GoodNews from the Supreme Court: "The Supreme Court on Friday again blocked Missouri from using a congres
The US Supreme Court on Friday again blocked Missouri from using a congressional map redrawn to give Republicans an edge in November's midterm elections. The order came less than two months before the vote, leaving election officials with little time to adjust plans. Commenters welcomed the ruling as unexpected good news from a court that has often backed redistricting efforts favorable to Republicans.
- 30Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for critical remarks●Justice Sotomayor apologizes to Justice Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh after publicly criticizing his opinion in an immigration case. The episode is notable for the court, whose justices traditionally avoid openly disputing each other's reasoning in public, and comes amid heightened political attention to the judiciary's handling of immigration rulings.
- 31Supreme Court citizenship database ruling signals bigger fight ahead▼Supreme Court citizenship database ruling highlights important appeal to come
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling concerning a citizenship database, a decision that observers say points to a more significant legal battle still to come. The case is tied to an important appeal that could determine how citizenship records are used by authorities. Legal watchers are closely following the implications of the ruling.
- 32Supreme Court again rejects GOP gerrymander in Missouri●Supreme Court again snubs GOP gerrymander in Missouri
The US Supreme Court has turned down a Republican-drawn congressional map in Missouri, declining to reinstate the gerrymandered district boundaries. It is at least the second time the Court has rebuffed the GOP effort in the state, leaving the existing map in place. The ruling comes amid ongoing national fights over partisan redistricting, with both parties maneuvering to reshape congressional maps ahead of the next midterm elections.
- 33Supreme Court Allows Trump-Era Database for Voter Screening●Supreme Court Allows Use of Trump Administration’s Expansive Database for Voter Screening
The US Supreme Court has cleared the Trump administration's expansive federal database for use in voter roll screening, per the New York Times. The move is likely to intensify debate over election integrity versus voter access, with critics warning it could lead to improper purges of eligible voters while supporters frame it as a safeguard against noncitizen voting.
- 34Virginia Democrats ask Supreme Court to restore redistricting plan▼Virginia Democrats ask US Supreme Court to override state court on nixing redistricting plan
Virginia Democrats have asked the US Supreme Court to intervene after a state court threw out their redistricting plan, requesting that the justices override the state ruling. The dispute centers on legislative maps drawn after the 2020 census, a fight with potential implications for control of the Virginia General Assembly. Critics and supporters are framing the case as another test of how far courts will go in partisan map-drawing battles.
- 35Supreme Court blocks GOP-favored Missouri map again▼Supreme Court blocks use of GOP-favored map in Missouri — again
The US Supreme Court has once again blocked the use of a Republican-favored congressional map in Missouri, preventing the state from implementing new district boundaries that had been advanced by GOP lawmakers. The repeated intervention comes amid an ongoing legal fight over redistricting in the state, with courts weighing whether the map complies with constitutional and voting-rights requirements.
- 36Supreme Court Blocks Republican-Backed Voting Map in Missouri●Supreme Court Once Again Blocks Republican-Backed Voting Map in Missouri
The US Supreme Court has once again blocked a Republican-backed congressional voting map in Missouri, halting the redrawn district boundaries from taking effect. It is the latest in a series of interventions by the court in redistricting disputes, and the renewed legal battle over Missouri's map is drawing national attention to how district lines are drawn and their impact on representation.
- 37California Supreme Court Orders Sheriff to Return 650,000 Seized Ballots▼California Supreme Court Rules Sheriff Illegally Seized 650,000 Ballots, Orders Their Return
The California Supreme Court has ruled that a county sheriff acted illegally when he seized roughly 650,000 ballots, and has ordered that they be returned. The decision is being covered internationally, including in Ukrainian-language media, and is expected to intensify debate over election security, law enforcement authority, and the handling of ballots in a US election.
- 38Supreme Court rejects GOP bid for Missouri maps again●Supreme Court — for third time — denies GOP’s bid to use Republican-friendly maps in Missouri
The US Supreme Court has, for the third time, refused to let Missouri Republicans use new congressional maps drawn to favor their party. The denial leaves existing district boundaries in place for now. The repeated rejections highlight ongoing legal battles over partisan gerrymandering in the state, with Republicans pushing redrawn maps and courts so far blocking their use.
- 39Supreme Court Can't Be Blamed for Congress's Failures, Critics Argue●We Can’t Blame the Supreme Court for Congress’s Problems
A new commentary argues that blame for US legislative dysfunction rests with Congress itself rather than the Supreme Court. The piece contends that progressives and critics who fault the judiciary for policy setbacks are overlooking lawmakers' own failures to pass legislation, shifting responsibility back to the elected branch and reigniting debate over institutional accountability in Washington.
- 40Supreme Court ruling leaves California 2026 election untouched▼Supreme Court ruling on DHS voter database will have no impact on California’s 2026 general election
The US Supreme Court has ruled on a case concerning a Department of Homeland Security voter database, and officials say the decision will have no bearing on California's 2026 general election. The ruling resolves a dispute over federal access to state voter records, but California's election procedures and voter rolls will continue unchanged for the upcoming contest.