UPR

The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating the bulk of his trade measures. The decision marks a major legal setback for the president's trade policy, striking at the core of an economic agenda that has defined his administration's approach to imports.

Immigrants have asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb the current stay while litigation continues over whether people can be removed to countries that are not their own. The case is a fresh flashpoint in the broader legal fight over the administration's aggressive deportation policies.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, a decision with direct implications for election administration. Supporters say the tool helps states maintain accurate voter rolls, while critics warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged ahead of elections.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, but his withdrawal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially increasing the chance of a split ruling on an issue with far-reaching environmental and regulatory consequences.

During hearings in the Supreme Court, arguments were made that India's Election Commission must not only be independent but also appear independent to the public. The debate focused on the perception of the poll body's impartiality, with the court examining concerns about its credibility and visible neutrality ahead of electoral matters.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to the Wall Street Journal. His recusal leaves the remaining eight justices to decide the matter, potentially raising the chances of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for his withdrawal from the case was given in the report.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, which reportedly involves housing inmates according to their sex assigned at birth. A lower court had paused the policy while litigation continues. The request puts the dispute before the nation's highest court, adding to a series of emergency applications the administration has filed on contested policy matters.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.

The US Supreme Court has issued a major ruling announced on a Friday night, a timing that immediately drew attention because late-week releases often accompany contentious decisions. Commentators and legal observers are reacting to the decision, with the dramatic framing of the news fueling wide discussion about what the ruling means and its potential impact.

The Bernalillo County Clerk in New Mexico says mail-in ballot processing remains on schedule following a Supreme Court ruling against a White House election plan. The decision had raised questions about whether local election offices might face disruptions, but the clerk reassured residents that ballots are being sent and returned as normal ahead of the vote.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has no specific health problems, responding to speculation about the 85-year-old leader's condition. The reassurance comes amid recurring rumors about Khamenei's wellbeing, which have circulated for years given his age and long hold on power. Officials in Tehran have repeatedly moved to deny such reports.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the Court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves eight justices to hear the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No reason for the recusal was given, and the development is drawing attention to how the vacancy-free but shorthanded bench may handle one of its most consequential environmental rulings.

The US Supreme Court is beginning its new term with several critical election-related cases potentially on its docket. Election law watchers say the justices could take up disputes over voting rules and election administration ahead of upcoming contests, with decisions likely to shape how future elections are run. Advocacy and legal groups are watching closely to see which cases the Court agrees to hear.

The Supreme Court has for a third time blocked the use of a Republican-drawn electoral map in Missouri. The repeated interventions mark an unusual level of judicial scrutiny of the state's redistricting, keeping Missouri's congressional district lines in flux ahead of upcoming elections. The ruling lands amid an intensifying national fight over partisan map-drawing, with both parties redrawing districts to seek advantages in narrowly divided chambers.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a pending climate case before the Court, according to a news report. The move means only eight justices will consider the matter, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split. No detailed explanation for the recusal was given in the report, and reaction so far has focused on what his absence could mean for the outcome.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, according to a report by the Washington Examiner. The move leaves the justices potentially split eight ways on a dispute with significant implications for US climate policy. No detailed reason for the recusal has been widely reported, and observers are watching closely to see how the case will proceed without him.

The US Supreme Court has upheld state laws banning transgender girls from competing on girls' school sports teams. The ruling allows such bans, already passed in multiple states, to remain in effect and is a significant setback for advocates of transgender inclusion in school athletics, while supporters of the laws say it protects fairness in women's sports.

Energy industry interests are asking the US Supreme Court to take up a case that could shield oil companies from climate-related lawsuits. According to Vox, the request is being described as audacious, with critics saying the industry is seeking to escape accountability in state courts where dozens of cities and states are suing over climate damages.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate-related case involving oil companies, according to an announcement carried by US media. His recusal means the case will be heard by the remaining eight justices, potentially affecting its outcome. No detailed explanation for his decision not to participate was given in the report.