UPR

Immigrants have asked the US Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that blocks the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The filing asks the justices not to disturb the current stay while litigation continues over whether people can be removed to countries that are not their own. The case is a fresh flashpoint in the broader legal fight over the administration's aggressive deportation policies.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of voters, a decision with direct implications for election administration. Supporters say the tool helps states maintain accurate voter rolls, while critics warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged ahead of elections.

The US Supreme Court has ruled against most of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, invalidating the bulk of his trade measures. The decision marks a major legal setback for the president's trade policy, striking at the core of an economic agenda that has defined his administration's approach to imports.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case the Court is set to decide. No reason for the recusal was given in the report, but his withdrawal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, potentially increasing the chance of a split ruling on an issue with far-reaching environmental and regulatory consequences.

During hearings in the Supreme Court, arguments were made that India's Election Commission must not only be independent but also appear independent to the public. The debate focused on the perception of the poll body's impartiality, with the court examining concerns about its credibility and visible neutrality ahead of electoral matters.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case when it is heard next week. The case is one of the most significant climate-related disputes to reach the Court, and his absence leaves eight justices to decide it, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower court rulings in place. No reason for his non-participation has been given in the announcement.

Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a Supreme Court case concerning climate change, according to the Wall Street Journal. His recusal leaves the remaining eight justices to decide the matter, potentially raising the chances of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for his withdrawal from the case was given in the report.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a high-profile climate case before the Court, according to Politico. The withdrawal removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate regulation, potentially affecting how the Court rules on an issue with sweeping implications for federal environmental policy and the states and industries involved.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift a lower-court block on its policy concerning transgender inmates, which reportedly involves housing inmates according to their sex assigned at birth. A lower court had paused the policy while litigation continues. The request puts the dispute before the nation's highest court, adding to a series of emergency applications the administration has filed on contested policy matters.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

The US Supreme Court is set to take up a lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking to hold energy companies liable for damages tied to wildfire risks linked to climate change. The case could determine whether local governments can pursue such claims in state courts, with broad implications for similar climate lawsuits nationwide.

The Supreme Court has for a third time blocked the use of a Republican-drawn electoral map in Missouri. The repeated interventions mark an unusual level of judicial scrutiny of the state's redistricting, keeping Missouri's congressional district lines in flux ahead of upcoming elections. The ruling lands amid an intensifying national fight over partisan map-drawing, with both parties redrawing districts to seek advantages in narrowly divided chambers.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

The Bernalillo County Clerk in New Mexico says mail-in ballot processing remains on schedule following a Supreme Court ruling against a White House election plan. The decision had raised questions about whether local election offices might face disruptions, but the clerk reassured residents that ballots are being sent and returned as normal ahead of the vote.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

The US Supreme Court has allowed states to use a federal database to verify the citizenship of voter registration applicants. The decision, reported by Route Fifty, clears the way for expanded vetting ahead of the midterm elections, though analysts say its practical effect on the upcoming contests will be limited because implementation timelines and coverage constraints restrict how widely the tool can be applied.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.

North Carolina officials have welcomed a US Supreme Court ruling concerning voter citizenship verification requirements. The decision touches on the ongoing national debate over election integrity and who may be required to prove citizenship when registering to vote. Supporters view it as a win for ballot security measures, while critics warn such checks can burden eligible voters. Details of the ruling's wider impact remain limited.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to continue deporting migrants to third countries — nations that are not their country of origin. The decision, reported by NBC News, represents a significant win for the administration's hardline immigration agenda. Critics say the policy could send people to countries where they face danger, and the ruling is expected to draw further legal challenges.

The US Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's redrawn congressional map for the third time, halting the gerrymandered district boundaries from taking effect while challenges continue. The repeated interventions keep Missouri's current congressional seats in place for now. The ruling is drawing attention from voting rights advocates and state officials locked in a dispute over partisan redistricting in the state.

The US Supreme Court is considering a case over the government's power to remove migrants to third countries — nations that are not their country of origin. The dispute centres on whether people facing removal to a third country must first be given a chance to raise claims of torture or persecution there. Lower courts had imposed due-process protections before removals, and the government has sought to lift those limits. Commentators are debating how the ruling could reshape deportation policy.

Attention is turning to state supreme court elections on the ballot this November in the United States. These races, often low-profile, draw interest because state supreme courts rule on abortion access, voting rules, redistricting and other contested issues. Observers are highlighting which states have open seats, how much money is flowing into judicial campaigns, and whether national political battles will spill into supposedly nonpartisan court contests.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may continue deporting migrants to third countries while the justices weigh the legality of the policy. The decision lifts, at least temporarily, lower-court restrictions on rapid removals to nations that are not the migrants' home countries. Supporters call it a win for executive authority on immigration; critics warn people are being sent to places where they face danger.

The Bernalillo County Clerk in New Mexico says mail-in ballot operations are proceeding on schedule following a Supreme Court ruling that went against a Trump administration plan. The decision removes uncertainty for election officials, and the county is confirming that voters' mail-in ballots will be handled as planned for the upcoming election cycle.

The US Supreme Court is considering a set of high-profile cases covering immigrant detention policy, gambling, and Ten Commandments disputes, per Reuters. The docket touches on immigration enforcement, gaming regulation, and religion in public life — issues likely to produce significant rulings affecting millions of Americans and non-citizens. Observers are watching how the court's conservative majority shapes law across these contested areas.

The Supreme Court will take up the question of whether judges have the power to extend voting hours, but only after the November election. The timing means any ruling will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, and the case is being closely watched given recurring litigation over polling hours and Election Day disruptions in contested states.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for the federal government to resume rapid deportations of migrants to third countries while litigation continues. The interim ruling does not decide the underlying legal questions, but allows removals to proceed in the meantime. The phrase 'for now' signals the decision is temporary, and lower courts may still impose limits as the case moves forward.

The Supreme Court opens its new term with a major case that commentators say will test the court's conservative majority like no other. Slate highlights the term-opening blockbuster as a defining moment for the conservative justices, who hold a 6-3 majority and face mounting scrutiny over how far they will push to reshape American law.

An independent UN expert has called on UK political leaders to uphold the UK Supreme Court's ruling concerning women's rights. The appeal, reported by UN News, frames compliance with the judgment as a matter of legal and human rights obligation. The ruling itself has been politically contentious in Britain, with ongoing debate over its implications for sex-based rights and gender recognition.

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether judges have the authority to extend voting hours at polling places, but the case will not be heard until after the November election. The timing means any ruling on judicial power over polling hours will come too late to affect the upcoming vote, leaving election procedures unchanged for now.

Delaware's Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control has updated the state's hunting regulations in response to a Delaware Supreme Court ruling concerning the minimum age requirement for hunters. The ruling prompted DNREC to revise its rules to bring them in line with the court's decision, affecting who is eligible to hunt in the state.

The Supreme Court has declined to stop polling in the Rajasthan Cricket Association elections, but has stayed the declaration of results. The order means voting will proceed as scheduled, though no outcome can be announced until the court gives further directions. The interim order comes amid ongoing legal disputes over the association's contested electoral process and governance.

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley is calling on Congress to fully fund the security funding request for the U.S. Supreme Court. The request would provide additional resources to protect the justices and the Court itself. Jackley's appeal adds a state-level voice to ongoing debates in Washington over security spending for federal institutions and officials.