Justice For All

Immigrants involved in a legal challenge have asked the US Supreme Court to keep in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to third-party countries. The request asks the justices to leave the current protections intact while litigation continues. The dispute forms part of a broader legal fight over the administration's immigration and removal policies.

A UN news roundup highlights US migration policies triggering what officials call a cascade of human rights violations, alongside warnings over funding shortfalls for refugee programmes. The brief also covers a new global report on the state of the world's forests and progress on restorative justice efforts in Colombia as the country continues dealing with the legacy of its armed conflict.

Reports say allegations that chemical weapons were used in Sudan are being brought before international justice mechanisms. The claims, which have circulated amid the country's ongoing war, are now drawing attention from legal and diplomatic circles. Details about which body is examining the allegations and what evidence has been presented remain limited in the reports.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending dispute over climate change, according to SCOTUSblog. His withdrawal from the case removes one vote from the panel that will decide the matter, and comes as the Court weighs its docket on major environmental and regulatory questions.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court. The recusal means only eight justices will weigh in on the outcome, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave a lower court ruling in place. Recusals by Supreme Court justices are rare and typically stem from conflicts of interest.

Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major Supreme Court case dealing with climate change, according to Politico. The withdrawal leaves the justices potentially split on a dispute with far-reaching consequences for US climate policy. Reasons for the recusal were not given, and it remains unclear how the rest of the court will rule.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to the New York Times. The decision removes one justice from a closely watched dispute over climate policy, raising questions about how the remaining eight justices might divide and why the recusal came so late.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change. The Wall Street Journal reported the decision, though no reason for his recusal has been given. His absence could affect the outcome, since the remaining eight justices may split evenly on the issue.

The US Justice Department has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals in election crimes cases. The department did not immediately provide details beyond the announcement. The move comes amid intense public scrutiny of election integrity and enforcement, and is likely to fuel debate over how aggressively federal authorities pursue misconduct related to voting and election administration.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case scheduled for next week, according to CNBC. The court is expected to hear arguments without him, which could affect the outcome if the justices divide closely. No reason for his recusal has been given in the report, and the case is being closely watched for its implications on climate regulation.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has reversed course and stepped aside from a major climate case, removing himself from the panel that would decide the dispute. No detailed explanation accompanied the announcement. The move could affect the outcome, since an eighth justice participating raises the odds of a 4-4 split, and it comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the justices' ethics and potential conflicts of interest.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court, CNN reports. The move means only eight justices will weigh the dispute, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave lower-court rulings in place. No reason for the recusal has been given, and the development is drawing attention because the case could shape US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a significant climate case amid scrutiny over his financial holdings in oil companies. The decision removes him from deliberations on a closely watched environmental dispute. Alito has previously faced criticism over ethics and potential conflicts of interest involving stock ownership and undisclosed gifts.

A legal challenge by the Brennan Center for Justice has resulted in the Trump administration's election-related conditions on anti-terrorism funding being struck down. The ruling removes requirements that tied access to security funding to election-related demands, a move welcomed by voting rights advocates who argued the conditions improperly politicised counter-terrorism grants.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case before the court. The decision removes one justice from a ruling that could shape how climate-related claims are handled in the United States, and observers are watching closely for what his absence means for the outcome.

An accused murderer had music he created with artificial intelligence played during his court proceedings, a detail that has drawn widespread attention online. The unusual scene has sparked discussion about how courts handle defendants' personal materials and the growing presence of AI-generated art in unexpected settings, with many reacting to the surreal collision of criminal justice and new technology.

New U.S. sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court are being described as a threat to European sovereignty. The measures could complicate cooperation between European states and the Hague-based court, raising concerns in Europe about the reach of American sanctions policy and the future of international justice institutions.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.

Military justice authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo are pursuing the two highest-ranking officials in connection with an aircraft crash near Kenge. The case has drawn attention across Congolese and francophone media, with commentary focusing on the involvement of senior figures and the decision to route the investigation through military rather than civilian courts.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could narrow legal protections for transgender people. The filing is being read as an effort to roll back established interpretations of sex discrimination protections. Civil rights groups warn the case could strip away safeguards in employment, healthcare and education, while supporters argue the current reading of federal law goes too far.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a climate change case scheduled ahead of the new court term, an unexpected move that could affect the outcome if the remaining eight justices split. Recusals by sitting justices are rare and usually tied to potential conflicts of interest. The court has not explained the decision, and observers are watching closely as the case moves forward without him.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to block a lower court order that halted its policy on transgender inmates, reportedly ending the housing of transgender women in women's federal prisons. The emergency application goes to the justices after a district court ruled against the policy. The request sets up another high-profile clash over transgender rights and presidential authority before the Court.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

A former White House election official has left or been removed from the Justice Department investigation targeting critics of Donald Trump, sources told Reuters. The development raises new questions about staffing and direction of the probe into alleged politicisation of the department. Details about the official's departure and the reasons behind it remain limited, with sources speaking on condition of anonymity.

The Department of Justice has filed charges against additional Pennsylvania residents accused of voting despite not being US citizens, part of a wider enforcement push. The move follows earlier prosecutions in the state and comes amid heightened national scrutiny of voter eligibility rules ahead of upcoming elections.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is not taking part in a case involving climate-related claims against major oil companies. His recusal reduces the bench to eight justices for the case, which could affect the outcome if the court splits. The case is being closely watched for its implications for climate litigation against the fossil fuel industry.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer known for promoting election denial claims, has resigned from the Department of Justice, according to sources cited by CBS News. The move raises questions about the department's staffing and its handling of election-related legal matters. Details on the timing or reason for his departure were not immediately disclosed.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from the pending case brought by Colorado municipalities against energy company Suncor over climate-related damages. The case tests whether state consumer-protection and nuisance claims against fossil fuel producers belong in state courts. With only eight justices participating, the outcome could end in a 4-4 split, leaving lower-court rulings in place.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.

Brazilian Supreme Court justice Luiz Fux has blocked a decision by fellow justice Flávio Dino and reinstated a TSE electoral court order concerning social media posts, according to Metrópoles. The move reopens a dispute between the two justices over platform regulation and content removal, a recurring flashpoint in Brazil ahead of the electoral period.