Justice

Immigrants have asked the Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that prevents the Trump administration from deporting them to countries other than their own. The request asks the justices to keep the restriction in force while litigation continues, setting up a fresh test of how far executive power over removals to third-party countries extends.

The UN's daily news roundup covers refugee funding shortfalls, a finding that United States migration policy has triggered a 'cascade' of human rights violations, a new report on the state of the world's forests, and restorative justice efforts in Colombia. The migration policy critique is the standout item, with UN human rights officials voicing concern over treatment of migrants.

Reports say allegations that chemical weapons were used in Sudan are being brought before international justice mechanisms. The claims, which have circulated amid the country's ongoing war, are now drawing attention from legal and diplomatic circles. Details about which body is examining the allegations and what evidence has been presented remain limited in the reports.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has voiced support for the International Criminal Court after the Trump administration imposed sanctions on the Court and its staff. The move puts Berlin at odds with Washington over the Hague-based tribunal, which the US penalises in connection with its investigations, including warrants targeting Israeli officials.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the court. The recusal means only eight justices will weigh in on the outcome, raising the possibility of a 4-4 split that would leave a lower court ruling in place. Recusals by Supreme Court justices are rare and typically stem from conflicts of interest.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will no longer take part in a pending dispute over climate change, according to SCOTUSblog. His withdrawal from the case removes one vote from the panel that will decide the matter, and comes as the Court weighs its docket on major environmental and regulatory questions.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard. The move comes without a publicly stated reason, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest in a case with wide-ranging implications for climate regulation. Legal observers are watching closely, as recusals by Supreme Court justices are rare and can affect the outcome of closely divided rulings.

The US Department of Justice has announced charges and guilty pleas involving 12 individuals in connection with election crimes. Details of the specific offences and defendants have not yet been widely reported, but the announcement comes amid heightened national attention on election integrity and enforcement ahead of upcoming votes.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has withdrawn from a major climate-related case, reversing an earlier decision to take part. The move means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, and it is likely to renew scrutiny of the justices' recusal practices and potential conflicts of interest in high-profile environmental litigation.

A former White House election official has left or been removed from the Justice Department investigation targeting critics of Donald Trump, sources told Reuters. The development raises new questions about staffing and direction of the probe into alleged politicisation of the department. Details about the official's departure and the reasons behind it remain limited, with sources speaking on condition of anonymity.

The US Department of Justice alleges Russian operatives planned to assassinate a dissident on American soil, according to reports from ABC News. The announcement has drawn attention to the reach of Russian intelligence operations inside the United States and follows earlier US warnings about plots against critics of the Kremlin living abroad.

Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate change case before the US Supreme Court, according to CNN. The move means only eight justices will weigh in on a dispute with significant implications for US climate policy. The reason for the recusal was not given in the report, and it remains unclear how his absence will affect the outcome.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a major climate change case scheduled for argument next week. The announcement, reported by CNBC, leaves the case with eight justices participating. Alito has not publicly stated his reason for stepping aside. The case is expected to be closely watched, and his absence could affect the outcome if the justices split evenly.

Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major Supreme Court case dealing with climate change, according to Politico. The withdrawal leaves the justices potentially split on a dispute with far-reaching consequences for US climate policy. Reasons for the recusal were not given, and it remains unclear how the rest of the court will rule.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a climate case involving oil companies, Reuters reports. The recusal means the case will be decided by the remaining eight justices, which could affect the outcome if the court splits evenly. No reason was given for his decision not to participate.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a pending Supreme Court case concerning climate change. The Wall Street Journal reported the decision, though no reason for his recusal has been given. His absence could affect the outcome, since the remaining eight justices may split evenly on the issue.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a significant climate case amid scrutiny over his financial holdings in oil companies. The decision removes him from deliberations on a closely watched environmental dispute. Alito has previously faced criticism over ethics and potential conflicts of interest involving stock ownership and undisclosed gifts.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has stepped aside from a major climate-related case before the Court. The recusal removes him from deliberations, potentially affecting the outcome in a closely watched environmental dispute. The development is drawing attention because recusals by sitting justices are rare and the case carries significant implications for US climate policy.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case just days before it was set to be heard, according to reports. The reason for the recusal was not given. The development is notable because it could affect the balance of the court's ruling on a high-stakes environmental matter.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in a forthcoming climate change case before the Court. The recusal removes one voice from a ruling that could carry major consequences for climate-related litigation and regulation in the United States. No detailed reason for his decision to step aside was included in the initial reports.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a case that could determine the fate of climate lawsuits brought by states and municipalities against major oil companies. Without giving a reason, Alito's removal leaves eight justices to weigh whether the suits, which seek damages for climate change harms, can proceed. The outcome could reshape how oil companies are held accountable for emissions, making the case one of the most consequential climate-related matters to reach the high court.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate change case before the court. News outlets including USA Today and the Detroit Free Press reported his decision to step aside, though neither report detailed his reasons or which case is involved. His absence could affect the outcome, leaving potentially eight justices to decide a matter with major implications for climate regulation.

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer known for promoting false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, has resigned from the Justice Department, according to sources cited by CBS News. Olsen had drawn attention for his role in challenging election results, and his departure is raising questions about election-related figures inside the department.

A legal challenge by the Brennan Center for Justice has resulted in the Trump administration's election-related conditions on anti-terrorism funding being struck down. The ruling removes requirements that tied access to security funding to election-related demands, a move welcomed by voting rights advocates who argued the conditions improperly politicised counter-terrorism grants.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow restrictions on gender-affirming health care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request seeks to undo lower court rulings that blocked such limits, and it lands amid ongoing legal and political battles over transgender rights and the treatment of transgender people in the US justice system.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not take part in the first case of the new term, a major climate dispute, reversing his earlier refusal to recuse. The decision follows calls from progressive critics who pointed to his stock holdings in oil companies as a conflict of interest. The move is drawing attention to ethics questions surrounding the justices and could affect how the climate case is decided.

Former special counsel Jack Smith is testifying publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee as Republican lawmakers examine the Justice Department investigations he led into Donald Trump. The hearings, covered live by major outlets, are expected to focus on how the classified documents and election interference cases were conducted. The appearance marks a rare public account from Smith, who brought two federal criminal cases against Trump.

The US Department of Justice has asked the Supreme Court to take up a case that could redefine legal protections for transgender people. The filing is drawing immediate attention from civil rights groups and conservative legal advocates, who see it as potentially reshaping anti-discrimination law and access to rights for transgender Americans nationwide.

The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to let it enforce limits on gender-affirming care for transgender inmates in federal prisons. The request asks the justices to allow the policy to take effect while legal challenges proceed, and it lands amid ongoing national battles over transgender healthcare and prison rights.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a major climate-change case scheduled to be heard next week, according to the Washington Times. The recusal means the remaining eight justices will decide a dispute with significant implications for climate regulation. No reason for the step-aside was given in the report, and it is not yet clear how his absence might affect the outcome or the court's ruling.

US Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito will not hear a major case that could affect his personal investments in oil and gas companies. The decision means the case will go forward without him, leaving the remaining eight justices to decide an issue in which Alito holds a disclosed financial stake.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to block a lower court order that halted its policy on transgender inmates, reportedly ending the housing of transgender women in women's federal prisons. The emergency application goes to the justices after a district court ruled against the policy. The request sets up another high-profile clash over transgender rights and presidential authority before the Court.

Military justice authorities in the Democratic Republic of Congo are pursuing the two highest-ranking officials in connection with an aircraft crash near Kenge. The case has drawn attention across Congolese and francophone media, with commentary focusing on the involvement of senior figures and the decision to route the investigation through military rather than civilian courts.

Germany's foreign minister visited the International Criminal Court in The Hague, pledging Berlin's full support for the institution despite US sanctions imposed under the Trump administration. The visit signals Germany's continued commitment to international justice, though it comes after Berlin also announced its own sanctions targeting ICC officials, creating a mixed picture of Europe's stance toward the court.