Federal Court

A US judge has overturned a White House media ban imposed under Donald Trump, ruling against the administration's attempt to exclude certain news organisations from access. The decision is being widely reported by major outlets including BBC News and is drawing significant attention, with many seeing it as a key test of press freedom and the limits of presidential control over media access.

A US federal judge has overturned President Trump's ban blocking certain media outlets from White House coverage. The ruling means journalists previously excluded from press access can return to presidential events and briefings. The decision is being widely covered as a significant test of press freedom and the limits of presidential power over media access, with strong public interest in how the administration will respond.

A federal judge has paused the Trump administration's restrictions barring certain media outlets, and CNN has been allowed back into the White House. The network reported on its own reinstatement, which follows legal challenges to the administration's efforts to limit access for some news organizations. The dispute is being closely watched as a test of press freedom and presidential control over media access.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision gives state election officials access to a federal immigration records system for voter roll checks, a step several Republican-led states have sought. Supporters frame it as a safeguard against noncitizen voting; critics warn it risks errors and could deter eligible voters, especially naturalized citizens, from registering.

CNN has returned to the White House press pool after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to restore the network's access, which had been revoked earlier. The ruling marks a significant check on presidential control over press credentials, and the network is covering its reinstatement closely as debate continues over press freedom and the limits of executive power.

A federal judge, Trump appointee Stephanie Gallagher, has held the Trump administration in contempt for deporting a man to El Salvador in violation of three court orders. The judge is ordering the government to return him. The ruling, reported by Politico legal correspondent Kyle Cheney, is drawing attention as part of the broader legal fight over the administration's immigration enforcement and compliance with court rulings.

A Supreme Court ruling concerning a disputed election may conflict with existing state law, according to reporting by Honolulu Civil Beat. The ruling raises questions about how election disputes should be resolved when federal judicial decisions and state statutes point in different directions. Further details about which state, which election, and the specific legal provisions involved were not provided in the available information.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of registered voters. The decision permits election officials to cross-check voter rolls against immigration records, a move backers say protects election integrity and critics warn could lead to eligible voters being wrongfully purged. The ruling is drawing sharp reactions from voting rights groups and election officials across the country.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that Trump administration officials may use a federal immigration database to cross-check voter registration records. The decision allows states and federal officials to verify voter eligibility using immigration status data, a move supporters call a safeguard against noncitizen voting and critics warn could wrongly purge eligible voters. The ruling is expected to intensify ongoing legal and political battles over election integrity and voting access ahead of upcoming elections.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to run voter citizenship checks using the federal SAVE database ahead of the midterm elections. The decision lets election officials verify the citizenship status of registered voters against federal records. Supporters say it protects election integrity, while voting-rights groups warn it could lead to eligible voters being wrongly flagged or purged from rolls close to the vote.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

The Mexican government has filed a lawsuit against Meta, accusing the company of human rights violations, in a federal court. The case, reported by Milenio, marks an unusual legal step by a national government against one of the world's largest technology companies. Details of the specific allegations and the remedies Mexico is seeking have not yet been made fully clear.

A federal court has ruled that Washington, D.C.'s parole and supervised release system discriminates against people with disabilities. Civil rights advocates, including the ACLU of D.C., welcomed the decision, saying it confirms that disabled people on parole or supervised release have been denied fair access to the system's programs and processes. The ruling is expected to push local authorities to change how they supervise people with disabilities.

Maine Senator Susan Collins is running her first re-election campaign since voting to confirm Supreme Court justices who later helped overturn federal abortion rights. Her 2022 vote for Brett Kavanaugh has become a central issue, with opponents and voters revisiting her assurances that Roe v. Wade would remain settled law. Coverage from Spectrum News and PBS highlights how the abortion decision continues to shape her race.

The Supreme Court has issued a decision concerning a federal voter-citizenship database, with potential consequences for upcoming midterm elections. The ruling raises questions about how states verify voter eligibility and could influence election administration and turnout battles heading into the midterms, with officials and voting-rights groups closely watching the implications.

A federal judge has referred attorneys representing Donald Trump for potential disciplinary action in connection with a lawsuit involving the IRS. The referral suggests the judge believes the lawyers' conduct in the case may have violated professional standards. Details about the specific allegations and which attorneys are affected have not been made fully clear, and any disciplinary proceedings would be handled by the relevant bar authorities.

A federal judge has ordered the Justice Department to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein, warning Attorney General Pam Bondi that contempt charges could follow if the department continues to withhold them. The order describes contempt as 'premature' for now, but signals the court is losing patience with the DOJ's stalling on the disclosures.

A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from conditioning anti-terrorism grants on changes to election procedures, ruling the administration cannot use homeland security funding to pressure states over how they run elections. The decision stops any requirement linking federal grant money to election-related demands, and is expected to draw appeals and renewed debate over federal power over state election administration.

A Cuban man has spent a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is now being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on detention authority. The report examines how federal immigration authorities have held him long-term despite legal questions about the limits of that power. His situation highlights the ongoing tension between immigration enforcement practices and constitutional limits on prolonged detention.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it is not complying with a court order concerning press access. The ruling puts the administration on a tight deadline to explain its position or face potential contempt proceedings. The development is drawing wide attention amid ongoing disputes between the administration and news organisations over media access and First Amendment obligations.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government may use Social Security data to help identify noncitizens registered to vote. The decision, reported by The Washington Post, clears the way for expanded data-sharing between agencies to verify voter eligibility. Supporters call it a safeguard for election integrity, while critics warn it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that states may use a federal citizenship verification tool when vetting voter registrations. The decision is seen as a win for election officials seeking to confirm eligibility, but its practical effect on the upcoming midterms is expected to be limited, since registration processes in most states will not change in time to alter November's outcomes significantly.

The US Supreme Court's SAVE ruling is being read as a signal that the Court could weaken a key protection that limits last-minute voter purges ahead of federal elections. Election law watchers say the decision may make it easier for states to remove voters close to Election Day, a practice critics warn risks disenfranchising eligible voters with little time to correct errors.

A federal court ruling requires Texas to install air conditioning in its prisons by 2029, following years of complaints and lawsuits over deadly heat in lockups that often exceed 100 degrees. The decision makes Texas the latest Southern state legally required to cool its correctional facilities, and it is drawing attention to prison conditions and inmate welfare nationwide.

The Supreme Court has taken up litigation concerning the SAVE income-driven student loan repayment plan and the federal student aid database behind it, putting billions of dollars in borrower balances back in question. The case tests the Education Department's authority to restructure repayment terms. Borrowers, servicers and policymakers are watching closely for how the ruling would reshape repayment options nationwide.

The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a climate-related case involving the City of Boulder, Colorado, on Monday. The case centers on the city's efforts to hold energy companies accountable for climate change damages, a dispute that could shape how similar local climate lawsuits proceed across the country. Observers are watching closely for implications on federal versus local authority over climate policy.

A federal court has ruled that the Pentagon can designate AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, according to the El Dorado News-Times. The decision allows the Defense Department to maintain the designation against the San Francisco-based artificial intelligence firm, a move with potential implications for its ability to work with the US government and defense contractors.

The Cato Institute argues that the Supreme Court's decision to reauthorize the SAVE student loan repayment program is being overstated by some commentators, and that its practical impact is smaller than claimed. The SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment scheme for federal student borrowers, has been a frequent target of litigation and political debate, making any court action on it headline-worthy.

A court has again rejected the Trump administration's effort to cut off funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The ruling blocks, for now, attempts to zero out the agency's budget, which is financed by the Federal Reserve rather than congressional appropriations. The decision preserves the consumer watchdog's operations while litigation over the administration's authority to reshape independent agencies continues.

A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the revival of the $7 billion Solar for All program, which the Trump administration had canceled. The program funded solar energy projects aimed at low-income and disadvantaged communities across the United States. The ruling means the administration must restart the program while related legal challenges over the cancellation move forward.

The Trump administration cancelled a $7 billion solar energy grant program, but a federal judge in Rhode Island has now ordered the program restored. The ruling is a setback for the administration's effort to roll back renewable energy funding and a win for states and organizations relying on those solar grants. Supporters of clean energy are highlighting the decision as a check on executive power over congressionally funded climate programs.

A recent court ruling has solidified a retreat from enforcement of the disability integration mandate, the policy requiring services to be provided in community settings rather than institutions. The decision leaves senior living operators facing uncertainty over their obligations, as federal backing for community-based placement requirements appears to be weakening and the regulatory outlook for the sector grows unclear.