Federal Court

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, according to a CNBC report. The ruling maintains a decision tied to Pentagon-related concerns over the company's role in federal supply chains. The designation is significant for the AI sector, as it could affect Anthropic's ability to win government contracts and signals heightened scrutiny of major AI providers in national security contexts.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban blocking certain journalists from White House press access, ordering that reporters be allowed back into press events. The decision is being widely covered as a significant test of First Amendment protections, with supporters calling it a victory for press freedom and the administration expected to contest or work around the ruling.

The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for states to use the federal SAVE database to verify the citizenship status of people registering to vote. The decision lets states check voter rolls against immigration records, a move supporters frame as election integrity and critics warn could disenfranchise eligible voters, fueling debate over voting access.

A federal judge has temporarily paused the Trump administration's ban barring CNN from the White House, and the network's reporters were allowed back into the building. The case has become a flashpoint in the broader fight over press access and the administration's efforts to penalize news outlets it views as unfavorable.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration may, for the time being, continue using its revamped federal voter eligibility database, which is used to check voter rolls against citizenship and other records. The decision is an interim one, allowing the database's use while legal challenges proceed. Supporters see it as a step toward election integrity; critics worry it could enable improper purges of eligible voters.

A federal judge has ordered the White House to respond by 12:30 PM to allegations that it failed to comply with a court order concerning press access. The deadline sets up a rapid test of whether the administration will follow the ruling, and the story is drawing heavy attention as a fresh flashpoint in ongoing disputes between the administration and the press corps over First Amendment access.

A Cuban man has spent a year in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention in Texas, and his case is now being used to test the reach of a Supreme Court ruling on detention authority. The report examines how federal immigration authorities have held him long-term despite legal questions about the limits of that power. His situation highlights the ongoing tension between immigration enforcement practices and constitutional limits on prolonged detention.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is pressing the DC Circuit to vacate a federal drone flight restriction that effectively criminalized aerial recording of immigration agents. The group argues the restriction blocks journalists and the public from documenting enforcement operations, raising First Amendment concerns. Commenters online are debating the balance between airspace security and the right to observe government agents at work.

A federal court has ruled that the Pentagon can designate Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, as a supply chain risk. The decision allows the Defense Department to maintain restrictions or scrutiny over Anthropic's role in federal contracting, raising questions about how AI firms are treated under national security procurement rules.

The White House has revoked CNN's access once more, openly defying a federal judge's order that had barred the administration from excluding the network. The move escalates the standoff between the administration and the press over press freedom, and the network is expected to challenge the ban in court again.

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a dismissal of patent claims against Google under Section 101, which governs patent-eligible subject matter in the United States. The case concerned internet advertising patents, and the appeals court agreed they could not stand. The decision is being followed closely by intellectual property lawyers and tech companies, as it reinforces how courts treat software and advertising-related patents under current eligibility standards.

A federal judge has ruled that Oklahoma cannot block a Jewish charter school from opening in the state. The decision resolves a dispute over state officials' refusal to approve the school. The ruling is likely to fuel ongoing national debate over charter schools with religious affiliations and the separation of church and state.