Climate Change

Commentary from Green Central Banking argues that Europe's record summer heat has laid bare a contradiction in the continent's economic policy. The piece contends that governments and central banks continue to pursue growth and monetary strategies that sit uneasily with the mounting costs of climate change, as heatwaves disrupt agriculture, labour and energy systems across the region.

Attention is turning to the link between a warming climate and malaria transmission. Rising temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns can expand the areas where malaria-carrying mosquitoes survive, potentially exposing new populations while reducing risk in some regions that become too hot or dry. Researchers and public health analysts are weighing how these changes could affect the global burden of a disease that still kills hundreds of thousands of people each year.

BBC World Service's The Climate Question podcast is exploring whether global efforts to combat extreme heat have failed. The episode examines rising temperatures worldwide and questions whether current climate policies and adaptation measures are keeping pace with increasingly dangerous heatwaves. Listeners are engaging heavily with the question, which lands amid another period of record-breaking heat.

The US Supreme Court has begun a new term with a docket that includes major cases on climate change and gun rights. The term is being closely watched for rulings that could shape federal regulatory power and the scope of the Second Amendment. Observers expect the court's conservative majority to play a decisive role in both areas.

The US Supreme Court is set to hear a major environmental lawsuit concerning climate change and the oil industry, according to a New York Times report dated October 5, 2026. The case is expected to have significant implications for environmental law and the energy business, drawing attention from legal, environmental, and industry observers alike.

The US Supreme Court has begun its new term with a closely watched climate change case at the top of its docket. The case is being described as a blockbuster, with potential consequences for how the federal government regulates greenhouse gas emissions and how far agency authority extends on environmental policy.

A link to an ETC article titled 'My friend's baby lived only a few months' is being shared alongside calls for daily news coverage of democracy and climate change. The article, published in ETC's climate and environment section, appears to be a personal account connected to environmental themes. It is circulating among readers framing climate change and democratic accountability as daily, urgent concerns rather than occasional topics.

The US Supreme Court has heard arguments in a case brought against major oil companies over their role in climate change. The case tests whether fossil fuel producers can be held liable for climate-related damages and whether such claims belong in state or federal courts. The ruling could shape dozens of similar lawsuits filed by cities and states across the country.

The US Supreme Court has begun a new term featuring high-stakes cases on climate change, immigration and gun rights. News outlets across the United States and abroad are highlighting the docket, which could produce landmark rulings affecting environmental regulation, border policy and Second Amendment protections. The term is being watched closely given the court's conservative majority and its recent record of consequential decisions.

The US Supreme Court begins its new term with a case asking whether major energy companies can be held liable for climate change damages. The outcome could shape the wave of state and municipal lawsuits seeking to make oil and gas producers pay for climate-related harm, and is being closely watched by both environmental advocates and the fossil fuel industry.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a climate change case linked to a Colorado wildfire that burned nearly five years ago. The case is expected to test questions about responsibility for wildfire damage in a warming climate. Details of the arguments and parties involved have not been laid out beyond the court's announcement that it will take up the dispute.

A first-person account published by The Tyee explores how a former climate change sceptic came to abandon the belief that global warming was a hoax. The writer reflects on what convinced them to change their mind and what that shift says about how people reconsider firmly held views on climate science.

The film 'Digger' is drawing attention for using satire to tackle the climate change debate. Reviewers describe the movie as wanting the final say on both climate change and the satire genre, positioning itself as a pointed commentary on environmental politics. The film's blend of comedy and eco-themes is sparking discussion about how cinema engages with the climate crisis.

The US Supreme Court has begun its new term with a case addressing who should pay for climate-related damage. The case will examine whether energy companies can be held liable in state courts for the costs of climate harm, a question with major financial and legal implications for polluters, state governments and communities seeking compensation.

Celeste Saulo, Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization, spoke at GZERO Media's Global Stage about preparing for El Niño. She argued that improved forecasting and artificial intelligence can give countries earlier warnings of droughts, floods and heat extremes, helping governments protect agriculture and vulnerable communities as climate change makes weather patterns more erratic.

A new essay titled 'The Inconvenient Truth Behind the Inconvenient Truth' argues that the famous 2006 climate film's approach to cutting emissions missed key realities about how decarbonisation actually works. The piece revisits nearly two decades of climate policy since Al Gore's documentary and asks whether the emphasis on individual awareness distracted from the structural changes needed to reduce emissions at scale.

ExxonMobil is taking its fight over climate change liability to the US Supreme Court, in a move that could shield its Houston-based oil operations from climate-related lawsuits. The company is seeking to limit the ability of cities, counties and other plaintiffs to pursue damages over its role in producing fossil fuels that contribute to global warming. The case is being closely watched because a ruling in Exxon's favor could set a national precedent affecting climate litigation against oil companies across the country.

The US Supreme Court, currently seated with eight justices, has agreed to decide whether cities can sue major oil companies for damages related to climate change impacts. The case will determine whether municipal climate liability lawsuits can proceed in state courts, a question that has stalled litigation brought by cities seeking billions in adaptation costs. With one seat vacant, a 4-4 split is possible, which would leave lower court rulings in place.

A US Supreme Court battle involving major oil companies has put climate change at the heart of the legal argument, with lawyers pointing to beetle infestations and forests increasingly prone to wildfire as evidence of climate harm. The case will test whether oil companies can be held accountable for climate-related damage, a question with sweeping consequences for the energy industry and communities affected by global warming.

Researchers report that carbon storage in the deep sea is linked to Earth's gradual cooling over the past 4.5 million years. The findings suggest shifts in how the ocean locked away carbon played a role in long-term climate change, drawing attention from climate scientists and ocean researchers discussing the implications for understanding past and future warming.

The United Nations has warned that extreme heat is putting pregnant women and newborn babies at serious risk, according to a new alert reported by international media. The warning highlights growing health dangers from rising temperatures, with expectant mothers and infants identified as especially vulnerable groups. The warning comes amid ongoing global concern over record heatwaves linked to climate change.

The US Supreme Court has begun its new term by taking up a high-stakes climate change case linked to Boulder County, according to NPR. The case is being described as a blockbuster, and it could shape how climate-related lawsuits proceed, drawing close attention from legal observers and climate advocates.

Three stories are drawing attention together: an investigation involving a FlyDubai pilot, a US Supreme Court hearing on a climate change case, and the final stretch of Brazil's presidential runoff election. The Brazil vote between Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and incumbent Jair Bolsonaro is being watched closely worldwide, alongside the American court case with major implications for emissions regulation.

A case before the US Supreme Court is set to help determine whether major oil companies can be held financially liable for climate change damage. The question of whether fossil fuel producers should compensate states and communities for climate-related harms has moved through lower courts for years, and the justices' decision could shape the future of climate litigation across the country.

The US Supreme Court's new term will begin with a major case on climate change, according to NPR and public radio outlets. The case is expected to shape how far federal authority extends over climate regulation, with broad implications for environmental policy and emissions rules. Details of the parties and legal questions remain limited in early coverage.

Environment, climate and international relations are being discussed together as one interconnected agenda, with analysts weighing how climate change shapes diplomacy, conflict and cooperation between states. Commentary centres on whether global institutions can deliver coordinated action on emissions, adaptation and climate-related security risks.