Climate Change

The film 'Digger' is drawing attention for how it tackles climate change through satire. Commentators highlight its attempt to have the final word on both the climate crisis and the comedic forms used to critique it, sparking discussion about whether satire can meaningfully shift the debate on environmental collapse.

A Bengali-language explainer is warning that a 'Super El Nino' may be on the way, with projections suggesting as many as 450,000 people could die from its effects. The report links the potential event to climate change and its expected impacts on weather patterns, heat, and public health. It is drawing wide attention among Bangla-speaking audiences concerned about extreme climate risks.

A coalition of states and cities filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday over its repeal of federal rules limiting greenhouse gas emissions from coal- and natural gas-fired power plants. The suit challenges the Environmental Protection Agency's rollback, with plaintiffs arguing the repeal undermines efforts to curb climate change. The case sets up another major legal fight over US climate policy.

A widely shared explainer estimates that the Earth's climate system is accumulating heat at a rate equivalent to roughly four Hiroshima atomic bombs detonating every second, with most of that energy absorbed by the oceans. The comparison is being used to make the scale of global warming tangible, and commenters are debating whether such visceral analogies help or distort public understanding of climate science.

A personal essay published in The Tyee recounts the author's journey from believing climate change was a hoax to accepting the scientific evidence behind it. The piece reflects on what convinced them to change their mind and offers a perspective aimed at readers who remain sceptical of mainstream climate science.

The US Supreme Court has begun a new term featuring high-stakes cases on climate change, immigration and gun rights. The docket is expected to draw intense public attention, as rulings could reshape federal environmental regulation, immigration enforcement and the scope of the Second Amendment. Observers are watching closely to see how the conservative-leaning bench handles three of the most divisive issues in American politics.

The US Supreme Court has begun its new term by taking up a case over who should pay for climate-related damage. The dispute touches on whether companies or governments can be held financially responsible for harm caused by global warming. Legal observers say the outcome could shape future climate liability lawsuits across the United States.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a climate change case tied to a Colorado wildfire that burned nearly five years ago. The case is expected to test questions of climate liability, and the announcement is drawing wide attention given the court's potential impact on how climate-related damages are pursued in the United States.

United Nations climate chief Simon Stiell is set to warn on October 5 that extreme heat is putting pregnant mothers and their newborns at increasing risk. The remarks, reported by The Straits Times, highlight rising health dangers from heatwaves for the most vulnerable, as climate change drives more frequent and intense heat events worldwide.

Celeste Saulo, Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organization, spoke at GZERO Media's Global Stage about preparing for El Niño. She argued that improved forecasting and artificial intelligence can give countries earlier warnings of droughts, floods and heat extremes, helping governments protect agriculture and vulnerable communities as climate change makes weather patterns more erratic.

A new essay titled 'The Inconvenient Truth Behind the Inconvenient Truth' argues that the famous 2006 climate film's approach to cutting emissions missed key realities about how decarbonisation actually works. The piece revisits nearly two decades of climate policy since Al Gore's documentary and asks whether the emphasis on individual awareness distracted from the structural changes needed to reduce emissions at scale.

Exxon is reportedly pursuing a Supreme Court strategy aimed at shielding its Houston-area oil operations from climate change lawsuits. The move could limit the ability of cities, counties and other plaintiffs to hold the company liable for climate-related damages in state courts, a fight that has stretched across years of litigation.

The US Supreme Court is set to hear a case that could help determine whether major oil companies can be held financially liable for climate change damage. The outcome may shape dozens of lawsuits filed by states and cities seeking damages from energy companies for costs linked to rising seas, wildfires and extreme weather.

E-International Relations is publishing material on the environment, climate and international relations, covering how climate change is shaping diplomacy and cooperation between states. Discussion centres on the growing overlap between environmental policy and foreign affairs, as governments negotiate shared responses to global warming.

A legal fight over climate change has begun at the United States Supreme Court, according to The New York Times. The case is expected to shape how far the courts and federal government can go in addressing climate policy, and it is drawing wide attention as one of the most consequential environmental disputes to reach the justices.

The US Supreme Court's new term is set to begin with a significant case on climate change, according to NPR and other news outlets. The case is expected to test the court's stance on climate-related litigation or regulation, drawing attention from environmental groups, states, and industries. Details of the parties and the exact legal question were not provided in the coverage.

The US Supreme Court is taking up a major climate change case, alongside a broader slate of consequential issues on its docket. A Washington Post opinion piece argues the court's decisions in the coming term could reshape environmental policy and extend well beyond climate, touching on other contentious areas of American law and governance.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to consider energy companies' request to end a climate-change lawsuit brought by Boulder, Colorado. The case is part of a broader legal fight in which US cities and counties are suing major oil and gas producers over climate-related damages, and the justices' decision could shape whether such lawsuits proceed in state courts.

The US Supreme Court is preparing to begin a new term featuring high-stakes cases on climate change, immigration and gun policy. The docket puts the court's conservative majority back at the center of national debates, with rulings expected to shape environmental regulation, executive authority on immigration, and the scope of Second Amendment rights.

Southern California is experiencing an unusual heat wave in October, with temperatures climbing well above seasonal norms across the region. Residents are being urged to stay hydrated and limit outdoor activity, and many are expressing frustration at the prolonged warmth, which some link to changing climate patterns.

Communities have organised quickly and effectively to block or slow data center construction, yet comparable grassroots momentum remains elusive on climate change. The question is drawing attention among environmental advocates who wonder what makes opposition to data centers easier to sustain, and what lessons that mobilisation might offer for broader climate organising.

Actor Paul Rudd is quoted by USA Today and The Arizona Republic describing climate change as 'the issue' of our time. The comments come as part of his public advocacy on climate, and the remarks are being picked up across US news outlets. Rudd, a well-known Hollywood figure, joins a growing list of celebrities using their platforms to press for climate action.

Global Health Otherwise highlights how long-term climate change is harming human health, linking shifts in climate patterns to medical consequences. The discussion focuses on the broader health effects of sustained environmental change rather than single weather events. With climate concerns again rising on the global agenda, the connection between planetary warming and public health outcomes is drawing renewed attention from health-focused outlets and readers.

Thailand is rolling out measures to prepare its farmers for the impacts of climate change, aiming to protect the country's food security. Reports from regional outlets say the effort focuses on helping agricultural communities adapt to shifting weather patterns that threaten crop production. Thai media and regional press are highlighting the initiative as a model for climate adaptation in Southeast Asian agriculture.

Bloomberg reports that London's most valuable homes are increasingly exposed to extreme weather, with floods, heatwaves and storms hitting affluent neighbourhoods once considered safe bets. The report highlights how climate risk is starting to affect prime central London property, an asset class long treated as a secure store of wealth for international buyers.

The US Supreme Court begins its new term by taking up an effort by major oil companies to dismiss climate liability lawsuits brought by states and municipalities seeking damages for climate change-related harms. The justices will consider whether the cases belong in state courts, where the suits were filed, or should be thrown out. A ruling could determine the fate of dozens of similar climate accountability claims across the country.

The US Supreme Court is set to hear a closely watched climate case on Monday. The outcome could shape how far the government and courts can go in addressing climate change, making it one of the term's most consequential environmental law battles.

The US Supreme Court has agreed to take up the question of whether oil companies can be compelled to pay damages for climate change. The case could determine the fate of lawsuits brought by states and cities seeking to hold major oil producers financially responsible for climate-related harm, a dispute that has wound through lower courts for years.