Artificial Intelligence

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman is scheduled to brief the UN Security Council next week, according to Reuters. The session would place one of the world's most prominent AI executives directly before global policymakers as governments weigh how to regulate artificial intelligence. The exact agenda and which of the 15 council members requested the briefing have not been disclosed.

China and the United States have agreed to establish a dedicated channel for dialogue on artificial intelligence safety, while also pledging to continue ongoing talks on trade and military matters. The agreement marks a rare area of cooperation between the two powers amid broader tensions, and observers are watching whether the AI dialogue and other negotiations can stabilize the relationship.

BBC News examines a case in which artificial intelligence was used to hack a government, exploring how such an attack was possible and what it reveals about security weaknesses. The report raises questions about how AI tools can be exploited for cyberattacks on public institutions and what safeguards governments may need as the technology spreads.

US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have agreed to establish a dedicated channel for discussing artificial intelligence safety, a step announced as military and trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing continue. The agreement marks a rare area of cooperation between the two powers, pairing AI risk dialogue with broader talks on defence and economic issues.

Singapore has proposed a United Nations framework convention on artificial intelligence safety, according to the Straits Times. The proposal would create an international treaty framework aimed at coordinating how countries manage AI risks. The initiative reflects growing calls for global governance of advanced AI, with the UN seen as the natural venue for such an agreement.

Climate discussions in New York are being reshaped by two converging pressures: rising energy costs and the surging power demand from artificial intelligence infrastructure. Commentators note that the growing electricity needs of data centres are complicating emissions goals and forcing policymakers to rethink how climate commitments and energy affordability can be balanced in the years ahead.

Donald Trump has rejected proposals to combine American and Chinese efforts on artificial intelligence, ruling out cooperation between the two countries in the field. The decision signals a continued hard line on AI competition with Beijing, keeping the United States and China on separate technological tracks despite calls in some quarters for joint governance of rapidly advancing AI systems.

China has rolled out AI-powered weed-killing machines across large areas of farmland. Each machine combines cameras, artificial intelligence and lasers: a vision system scans plants while AI distinguishes crops from weeds, allowing targeted destruction of weeds without damaging crops. The machines have already entered operation, and the technology is drawing attention as a potential alternative to chemical herbicides in large-scale agriculture.

Climate activists are campaigning against AI data centers and Amazon's plan to build what would be the largest gas-fired power plant in the United States. Protesters argue that the booming energy demands of artificial intelligence are driving new fossil fuel infrastructure, undermining climate goals. The story, reported by Democracy Now!, highlights growing tension between the tech industry's expansion and environmental commitments.

China and the United States have agreed to establish a dedicated channel for talks on artificial intelligence safety, while also committing to continue dialogue on trade and military matters. The agreement marks a rare area of cooperation between the two powers amid ongoing tensions, and has been widely reported across US news outlets.

China is publicly rejecting American warnings about its fast-moving artificial intelligence programme, framing US concerns as an attempt to contain its technological rise. The dispute adds a new front to US-China tensions, with Beijing arguing its AI development is peaceful and legitimate while Washington warns of security risks from rapid, insufficiently controlled advances.

Pope Leo opened his trip to France with a stark warning that a 'paradise of machines' risks undermining humanity, urging that technology should serve people rather than replace human judgment and dignity. The remarks, made at the start of the visit, tie growing unease over artificial intelligence to a moral and spiritual call for balance.

Donald Trump has announced plans to create an 'AI Force', a new initiative focused on artificial intelligence. Details about the structure, funding, and mandate of the proposed force have not yet been laid out, and reactions are still forming as observers wait to learn what the initiative would actually do and how it would fit into existing government AI efforts.

Australian authorities have formally summoned the chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic to appear before a public inquiry into artificial intelligence. The move marks a rare step of compelling US AI company leaders to testify abroad. The inquiry is examining the risks and regulation of advanced AI systems, and attention is on whether the executives will attend and what commitments they may offer.

The chief executive of AI company Anthropic has called for stronger regulation of artificial intelligence, telling ABC News in an exclusive interview that tougher oversight is needed as the technology advances. The remarks add to a growing debate in the United States and Europe over how governments should police powerful AI systems while keeping innovation alive.

The New York Times reports on the reasons behind China's skepticism toward international appeals for artificial intelligence safety cooperation. The piece examines how Chinese officials and researchers view Western-led AI safety campaigns, and what that divide means for global efforts to govern rapidly advancing AI systems. Details beyond the headline are limited.

Chinese state media has stated that the United States shares responsibility for managing artificial intelligence, according to Bloomberg. The remark signals Beijing's push to frame AI governance as a shared global task between the two powers, amid ongoing US-China tensions over technology export controls and AI safety standards.

Chinese state media is arguing that the United States shares responsibility with China for managing artificial intelligence. The statement positions AI governance as a joint duty between the world's two largest AI powers, coming amid ongoing tensions over technology export controls and competing national AI strategies. No further details about the exact remarks or the outlet's proposed framework were available in the coverage collected.

Classified budget estimates indicate the National Security Agency is paying billions of dollars to test artificial intelligence models, according to a new report. The figures suggest US intelligence agencies are investing heavily in evaluating advanced AI systems, likely for national security and surveillance applications. The scale of the spending is drawing attention to how deeply spy agencies are moving into AI.

Austrian semiconductor substrate maker AT&S is drawing attention for its role in producing the advanced substrates that sit beneath AI chips, a critical and supply-constrained layer of the artificial intelligence hardware supply chain. As demand for AI processors surges, chipmakers and governments are racing to secure substrate capacity, putting AT&S at the center of the conversation about AI supply bottlenecks.

Leading artificial intelligence companies are investigating tens of thousands of security incidents, according to an Axios report. The scale of the probes highlights growing cybersecurity pressures on firms building and deploying AI systems, as attackers and misuse attempts rise alongside the technology's rapid adoption across industry and government.

The Guardian reports that artificial intelligence has emerged as a defining issue for potential Democratic contenders ahead of the 2028 US presidential election, laying out where prospective candidates stand on the technology. Early positioning on AI regulation, jobs and safety is becoming a way for hopefuls to differentiate themselves, showing the debate is moving from policy circles into campaign strategy well before primaries begin.

A New York Times analysis examines why China treats American-led calls for A.I. safety cooperation with suspicion, framing them as moves that could slow Chinese progress in the technology race. The piece explores how distrust between Washington and Beijing shapes each side's approach to regulating advanced artificial intelligence, and what that means for global governance efforts.

Data centers, power plants and chip facilities for artificial intelligence are being built across the United States at a pace that could surpass any previous infrastructure boom in the country's history. Analysts point to massive capital commitments from tech companies racing to secure computing power, raising questions about electricity demand, grid strain and whether the investment will pay off.

The chief executives of OpenAI and Anthropic have been called to appear before an Australian parliamentary inquiry into artificial intelligence, according to Reuters. The summons puts the heads of two of the world's leading AI companies at the centre of Australia's examination of the technology's risks and regulation. The companies have not yet publicly responded to the invitation.

School systems across the globe are taking sharply different approaches to artificial intelligence in education. In the United States, Zohran Mamdani's veto has drawn attention to resistance against AI use in schools, while Estonia has embraced the technology with enthusiasm, integrating it into classrooms. The divide highlights how education authorities are still searching for common ground on whether AI helps or harms learning.

Artificial intelligence is making law firms significantly more efficient, but corporate clients are now questioning why their legal bills have not dropped accordingly. The New York Times reports that clients expect savings from faster document review and research to be passed on to them, putting pressure on firms' traditional billable-hour models and sparking debate over who benefits from A.I.-driven productivity gains.