Apple Pay

A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the feedback feature used in iPhones and other devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent damages awards in US history, and attention is turning to whether Apple will appeal the decision.

A US jury has ruled that Apple must pay a record $5.7 billion in damages in a patent dispute over haptic technology, the vibration and touch-feedback systems used in its devices. The verdict ranks among the largest patent damages awards ever issued in the United States, and discussion is focused on what the ruling means for Apple and for future haptic patent litigation.

A jury has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion in a patent dispute over haptic feedback technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch. The verdict, one of the largest patent awards against the company, centers on the vibration motors that provide tactile feedback. Apple is expected to appeal, and attention now turns to whether the damages will be reduced or overturned.

A US jury has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion in damages over claims that the haptic feedback technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch infringes patents held by another company. The verdict is one of the largest patent awards against the company and may still face appeals.

Banks and credit unions in the United States are forming a coordinated pushback against fees tied to Apple Pay, as an antitrust lawsuit over Apple's payment practices advances. The case challenges the cut Apple takes on transactions made through its wallet service, and financial institutions argue the fees raise their costs. The lawsuit moving forward has revived debate over Apple's control of mobile payments.

Qualcomm and Apple have renewed their patent licensing agreement, keeping their arrangement in place through 2027. The deal allows Apple to continue using Qualcomm's wireless technology in its devices while paying licensing fees. The two companies have had a complicated relationship, combining litigation over licensing terms with heavy commercial dependence, since Apple's modems still rely significantly on Qualcomm components.

A court has ordered Apple to pay $5.7 billion to Taction Technology, ruling that the company used patented technology in its App without authorisation. The verdict ranks among the larger patent judgments against Apple, and if it stands it could pressure the company to licence or redesign features at the centre of the dispute. Appeals in such patent cases are common.

A federal jury in San Diego has ordered Apple to pay more than $5.7 billion in damages to Taction, a haptics technology company that sued in 2021 claiming Apple infringed two of its patents, US Patent Nos. 10,659,885 and 10,820,117. The verdict, covering technology related to haptic feedback, is one of the largest patent damages awards against Apple.

Apple has reportedly been ordered to pay $5.7 billion in a patent infringement case, according to a widely shared headline. The claim describes a verdict over alleged unauthorized use of patented technology, but no further details about the court, the plaintiff, or the specific patents are available in the available reporting.

Apple is paying out $250 million as part of a settlement related to AI features on its iPhones, and claim filing is now open to eligible customers. Outlets are walking users through the process step by step, including who qualifies, deadlines, and how to submit a claim. The payout stems from allegations that marketed AI capabilities did not perform as advertised.

Apple has started offering a lease program covering iPhones and other devices, according to Scripps News. The move would let customers pay monthly to use Apple hardware rather than buying it outright, adding a new option alongside existing installment plans and trade-in offers. Details on pricing, availability and lease terms have not been widely reported yet.

Apple has been ordered to pay $5.7 billion to Taction Technology over haptics technology used in the iPhone and Apple Watch. The ruling, reported by Fortune, covers vibration and touch-feedback features central to both devices. It ranks among the largest patent damages awards against Apple, and the company is expected to contest it.