search
Amendment 83
Trends
- 1Colorado Voters to Decide on Right to Hunt and Fish Amendment▼Amendment 83: Colorado voters will decide whether to place right to hunt and fish in state constitution
Colorado voters will weigh Amendment 83, a ballot measure that would add a right to hunt and fish to the state constitution. Supporters frame it as protecting a heritage and outdoor traditions from future restrictions, while critics raise questions about how constitutional language could affect wildlife management. The measure will appear before voters in the upcoming election.
- 2Colorado's Amendment 83 would enshrine hunting and fishing rights▼Amendment 83 protects your right to hunt, fish | GUEST COLUMN
A guest column in Colorado Politics argues for Amendment 83, a proposed state constitutional amendment that would protect the right to hunt and fish in Colorado. Supporters frame it as a safeguard for outdoor traditions against future restrictions, a familiar measure several other US states have already adopted ahead of the state's ballot vote.
- 3Legal Scholars Slam Amendment 83 as Vague Bid to Hijack Wildlife Management▼Legal Scholars Describe Amendment 83 Language as “Vague” and “Undefined” and Call It an Attempt to “Hijack” Wildlife Management
Legal scholars are criticizing Amendment 83, describing its language as vague and undefined and arguing the measure amounts to an attempt to hijack wildlife management authority. The critique, voiced through the advocacy group Animal Wellness Action, suggests the amendment could shift control over wildlife policy in ways experts warn are legally ambiguous and potentially harmful to established management frameworks.