AI legislator

Bill Gates has added his voice to growing calls for safeguards on artificial intelligence, including new legislation to govern the technology. The move puts the Microsoft co-founder alongside other prominent tech figures urging governments to set rules as AI tools spread rapidly. The intervention adds weight to the debate over how regulators should balance innovation with risks from powerful AI systems.

A New York Times report argues that artificial intelligence is advancing faster than governments can regulate it, leaving lawmakers increasingly behind on oversight, safety rules and public policy. The piece examines the widening gap between the pace of AI innovation and the slow machinery of legislation, a tension currently at the center of debates in Washington, Brussels and other capitals over how to govern powerful AI systems.

US lawmakers are reportedly struggling to craft policies that keep up with the rapid spread of artificial intelligence, with one account describing the challenge as something that 'dumbfounds us all'. The story, circulated by several US outlets, highlights Congress's difficulty in regulating technology that is reshaping industries faster than legislation can be written. No specific bill or lawmaker is named in the available coverage.

Bill Gates has urged US legislators and law enforcement to regulate the development of artificial intelligence, saying in a television interview with Kristen Welker that oversight is needed. The comments are drawing attention as debate intensifies over how far governments should go in policing AI development.

US lawmakers are reviewing a series of proposals aimed at securing artificial intelligence systems and protecting them from misuse. The measures under consideration in Congress would address AI-related security risks, reflecting growing legislative attention to how rapidly evolving AI technology could affect national security and critical infrastructure. Details of the individual proposals and their prospects remain limited so far.

Bill Gates is calling on the US Congress to write artificial intelligence safeguards into law, arguing that guardrails for the rapidly advancing technology should be established through legislation. The appeal adds a prominent business voice to the ongoing debate in Washington over how, and how quickly, to regulate AI.

US lawmakers are facing mounting questions over artificial intelligence safety, with Congress under pressure to act on regulating the fast-moving technology. Coverage highlights the gap between growing public and expert concern about AI risks and the slow pace of legislative response in Washington. Debates continue over how, and how strictly, AI systems should be overseen by federal law.

Some members of Congress are openly questioning whether the legislature is equipped to regulate artificial intelligence, with one lawmaker describing the institution as 'barely capable of email.' The remarks reflect growing concern inside Washington that the technical complexity of AI is outpacing lawmakers' understanding, raising doubts that meaningful oversight or legislation can be passed in the near term.

Some members of Congress are openly questioning whether the institution is equipped to regulate artificial intelligence, citing its slow legislative pace and limited technical understanding of AI systems. The concern is that a body often described as struggling even with basic technology like email may fail to keep up with the rapid development of AI tools, leaving gaps in oversight while the technology advances faster than legislation can respond.

Calls are growing for Congress to pass AI safety legislation more quickly, even as President Trump has spoken against tougher regulation of artificial intelligence. The debate pits lawmakers and safety advocates, who warn that unchecked AI development poses risks, against a White House resistant to new rules, leaving the pace of any federal action uncertain.

North Carolina's attorney general is calling on Congress to establish guardrails on artificial intelligence following a wave of bot attacks. The request follows incidents involving AI-powered bots, and the state's top legal officer wants federal legislation to address the risks these systems pose to consumers and elections.

A federal court ruling could call into question Wisconsin's law banning AI-generated child sexual abuse material. The case raises legal questions about whether computer-generated depictions fall under existing statutes targeting child exploitation. Observers are watching to see whether the state's prohibition survives constitutional scrutiny or requires legislative revision.

US states are moving ahead of the federal government on regulating artificial intelligence safety, with state legislatures drafting and passing their own AI rules. The trend highlights a growing gap in Washington, where comprehensive AI legislation has stalled, leaving individual states to set standards on issues like transparency, bias and consumer protection.

An academic has warned that the EU's AI legislation systematically fails to protect authors' moral rights, such as attribution and the integrity of their work, as AI systems increasingly train on and generate creative content. Writing in World Trademark Review, the scholar argues that current EU law focuses on economic rights and compliance rules while leaving moral rights largely unaddressed, raising concerns for writers and creators across Europe.

Oregon's attorney general is urging Congress to establish federal guidelines for artificial intelligence. The appeal reflects growing concern among state officials that AI is developing faster than existing laws can handle, leaving consumers vulnerable to fraud, privacy violations and other harms. The call adds to pressure from state leaders for Washington to create a unified national regulatory framework.

Senator Adam Schiff promoted a new bipartisan bill creating a federal film tax incentive during an appearance on CNN's 'The Story Is with Elex Michaelson'. He also urged Congress to move forward with regulating artificial intelligence, arguing legislative action is needed. Schiff framed the tax measure as an example of cross-party cooperation in a divided Congress.

Oregon's governor has ordered additional regulation of artificial intelligence, directing state agencies to develop new oversight rules for the technology. The move makes Oregon one of a growing number of US states acting on AI governance amid limited federal legislation. Details of the executive order, including which systems will be covered and enforcement timelines, were not immediately available.

A planned sale of camera maker Leica has failed, keeping the company independent. In Australia, new AI legislation is affecting a mural artwork, sparking debate among photographers about how the law applies to art. Other photo news of the week includes In-N-Out taking action against a team photo shoot and a spectacular image of a solar eclipse, drawing wide attention in the photography community.

Bernie Sanders, joined by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jeff Merkley, has introduced legislation to ban the federal government from using Flock AI-powered surveillance cameras, while Josh Hawley is putting forward a separate Stop Flock Abuse Act establishing safeguards for the same technology. The bipartisan attention signals growing concern in Congress over automated license plate readers and mass surveillance.

Australian Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has commented on a reported data breach involving OpenAI and Medicare, saying legislation must keep pace with technological change. She stressed the need for clear legal safeguards and a defined government response strategy to handle emerging technology challenges. The comments add to scrutiny of how sensitive citizen data is protected and how Australia regulates artificial intelligence tools used across the public sector.

New Connecticut laws regulating artificial intelligence and data privacy are set to take effect on October 1. The rules will affect how companies in the state handle personal data and deploy AI systems, and residents are being urged to understand what protections and obligations the legislation introduces.

Senators Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell have reached a bipartisan agreement on college sports legislation, a notable moment of cooperation in a divided Congress. The bill addresses the governance of college athletics, likely touching issues such as athlete compensation and NIL rules. Commentary, however, notes the measure is narrow in scope and should not be expected to deliver breakthroughs in unrelated areas such as artificial intelligence policy.

New York State laws extend legal protections to whistleblowers who raise concerns about artificial intelligence, according to local reporting. The protections mean workers who flag risks or wrongdoing involving AI systems can seek safeguards against retaliation. The reporting highlights how state legislation is being applied to the fast-growing AI sector, where employees at tech companies have increasingly spoken out about safety and ethical concerns.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed new legislation aimed at protecting the state's workers from threats posed by artificial intelligence. The laws, reported by the Guardian, are intended to shield jobs and labour rights as AI adoption spreads through workplaces. The move positions California, home to much of the US tech industry, at the centre of the debate over regulating AI's impact on employment.

YouTuber and interviewer Peter Diamandis has released a conversation with AI researcher Richard Socher covering when artificial superintelligence and recursive self-improvement might arrive, Congressman Ro Khanna's move to ban recursive AI development, and Tavus' technology passing a Turing test. The discussion touches on the most contested questions in AI today: timelines, regulation and machine-human indistinguishability.

California has enacted new legislation aimed at protecting workers from the threat of artificial intelligence displacing their jobs. The Guardian reports that the measures directly address what many employees consider their biggest fear about AI: being replaced by automation. As home to Silicon Valley and much of the AI industry, California's response is being watched nationally as other states consider similar worker protections.

Lina Khan, chair of the US Federal Trade Commission, said Congress needs to legislate on artificial intelligence rather than leave oversight to existing regulators. She argued that clear statutory rules are needed to govern AI development and curb potential harms. Her remarks land amid an ongoing US debate over how, and how quickly, lawmakers should regulate the fast-moving AI industry.

A New Jersey lawmaker has introduced legislation aimed at blunting the impacts of artificial intelligence on workers. The proposal, covered by New Jersey Monitor and other outlets, seeks to protect employees as employers increasingly adopt AI tools that could affect jobs, hiring and workplace decisions. Details of the bill's specific provisions have not been widely reported yet.

A bipartisan-sounding group of 26 state attorneys general has called on Congress to regulate frontier artificial intelligence models while preserving states' own authority to act. The attorneys general argue federal rules are needed on advanced AI, but that states must keep their powers to enforce consumer protection and address harms within their borders. The push comes amid ongoing debate in Washington over whether to pre-empt state AI laws with a single federal framework.

California has moved to regulate the use of AI-generated 'synthetic performers' in advertising, following New York's lead. The rules target digital likenesses and AI-created talent used in commercial campaigns, imposing disclosure or consent requirements on advertisers. Law firms and marketers are closely watching the legislation as it could reshape how brands deploy AI-generated personas and cloned voices in campaigns nationwide.

An opinion piece argues that AI-generated political deepfake advertisements are spreading rapidly online while state legislators remain unable to craft effective rules in response. The commentary highlights the gap between fast-moving AI technology and slower legislative processes, raising concerns about voter manipulation ahead of elections and urging lawmakers to act on disclosure requirements and oversight.

Bernie Sanders has put forward legislation aimed at regulating artificial intelligence, and social media users are sharing plain-language explainers of what the bills would actually do. One widely shared post, framed as an "ELI5" explainer, sets out the bills' contents for people unfamiliar with them, prompting discussion about how the proposals would affect workers and AI development.

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal has introduced a legislative framework that would establish a national charter system to regulate artificial intelligence in the United States. The proposal aims to rein in AI development through federal oversight. Details beyond the announcement are limited so far, and reaction from lawmakers, industry and the public is still emerging.

Congress is set to leave Washington ahead of the November midterm elections without passing any major legislation regulating artificial intelligence, according to The New York Times. Despite numerous hearings, proposals and bipartisan interest in issues like deepfakes, data privacy and AI safety, lawmakers have failed to advance comprehensive rules, leaving the United States without a federal framework as the technology rapidly develops.

Commentary at Tech Policy Press argues Taiwan needs a deepfake law that actually works to protect its elections. The piece contends that AI-generated manipulated media poses a growing threat to voters and candidates, and calls for legislation that is practical and enforceable rather than symbolic, as Taiwan faces ongoing information pressure from abroad.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hopes any guardrails on artificial intelligence remain voluntary, as Congress shows little sign of passing binding AI legislation. His comments highlight the gap between growing calls for regulation of AI companies and a legislature that has failed to advance comprehensive rules, leaving oversight largely to voluntary commitments from the industry itself.