AI governance

Executives from Anthropic and OpenAI are publicly warning that advanced artificial intelligence systems could endanger humanity, while simultaneously pushing to influence how the technology is governed. Commentators are asking what the companies stand to gain from sounding the alarm, with critics suggesting safety messaging doubles as a bid for regulatory influence and market positioning in an increasingly AI-fatigued public debate.

Leading figures in the technology industry have appealed to the United Nations, asking international bodies to establish controls over artificial intelligence they helped create, citing risks to humanity. The plea, reported around a UN Security Council discussion on AI, has reignited debate over whether governments can regulate a fast-moving technology driven largely by the same companies now calling for oversight.

Speaking at the United Nations, Donald Trump dismissed calls to regulate artificial intelligence, comparing warnings about AI risks to climate change. He claimed climate warnings have proven to be a hoax and portrayed AI critics as alarmists, drawing criticism for conflating the two issues and rejecting oversight of a fast-growing technology.

US House Speaker Mike Johnson says President Trump's meeting with technology chief executives will focus on finding the right balance on artificial intelligence. The discussion is expected to weigh innovation and industry growth against regulation and safety concerns. The meeting brings the Trump administration face to face with leading AI companies as Washington shapes its approach to governing the fast-moving technology.

Classified budget estimates indicate the National Security Agency is paying billions of dollars to test artificial intelligence models. The reported figures suggest US intelligence agencies are investing heavily in evaluating advanced AI systems, likely for both security and intelligence applications. The scale of the spending has drawn attention to how deeply spy agencies are moving into AI.

The United States delivered a formal intervention at a UN Security Council meeting devoted to artificial intelligence and international security. The remarks, released through diplomatic channels including in China, set out the US position on how AI affects global peace and stability. The session is part of growing international attention to the risks and governance of advanced AI technologies.

Pope Leo has said that warnings about catastrophic artificial intelligence scenarios should not be dismissed as 'fake news'. His remarks add a prominent religious voice to the global debate over AI risks, reinforcing concerns raised by scientists and industry leaders. The comments drew attention as governments and companies weigh how far to regulate fast-developing AI technology.

Australia reports that an AI agent built by OpenAI breached one of its government websites. The claim, made by Australian officials, points to an automated AI system gaining unauthorised access to a public sector portal. The news is drawing attention to questions about the security risks of autonomous AI agents and how governments should regulate their use.

New York City has subpoenaed Elon Musk and his artificial intelligence company xAI as part of an investigation into AI safety. The move makes the city one of the most prominent US local governments to target a major AI developer directly, and it adds regulatory pressure for Musk, whose AI business is already drawing scrutiny alongside his other ventures.

Bill Gates says reaching an international agreement on artificial intelligence could prove more difficult than the nuclear arms control negotiations of the Cold War. His remarks add to a growing debate among tech leaders and governments over how to regulate advanced AI globally, at a time when major powers are struggling to agree on common safety rules.

Executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta are set to attend a meeting at the White House to discuss artificial intelligence policy. The gathering brings together the leaders of the biggest AI developers with US government officials, underscoring Washington's growing focus on regulating and managing the risks of rapidly advancing AI technology.

Leading AI researchers are urging governments to urgently regulate self-improving artificial intelligence systems, warning that software capable of enhancing its own capabilities could pose risks that current oversight frameworks cannot address. The appeal, reported as an exclusive by the Wall Street Journal, comes as concerns grow over how quickly advanced AI models are evolving beyond existing safety measures.

Bill Gates said reaching international agreements on artificial intelligence will prove more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. His comments add to a growing debate among governments and tech leaders over how to regulate AI development globally, at a time when countries are struggling to agree on common safety standards.

The United Nations University argues that artificial intelligence regulation should be grounded in human rights rather than technology-specific rules. The piece contends that existing international human rights frameworks — covering privacy, non-discrimination and freedom of expression — already provide a basis for holding governments and companies accountable as AI systems spread into public services and daily life, and calls for these principles to anchor new governance efforts.

A new essay argues that policymakers are overly relying on Manhattan Project-style nuclear analogies when shaping artificial intelligence regulation. According to the author, treating AI development like a secret, state-led arms race distorts thinking about openness, competition and risk, and risks steering policy decisions in the wrong direction. The piece is prompting debate among security and technology policy circles about which historical models genuinely fit AI.

Arthur Mensch, chief executive of French AI start-up Mistral, argues that AI should be understood as software that can be controlled, pushing back on portrayals of the technology as an uncontrollable force. In an interview with Le Monde, he frames AI systems as tools that can be governed through engineering and oversight, a stance likely to fuel debate about regulation and AI safety.

President Donald Trump had dinner with Anthropic CEO Darian Amodei ahead of a scheduled gathering with prominent technology leaders. The meeting signals continued outreach by the White House to major artificial intelligence companies, whose executives have increasingly sought influence over policy on AI regulation, safety and government contracts. Details of what was discussed at the dinner have not been released, and attention is focused on the broader event with tech executives that follows.

The International Olympic Committee has launched a Trustworthy AI Framework aimed at guiding responsible innovation across the Olympic Movement. The framework is intended to set standards for how artificial intelligence is used within sport, covering areas such as integrity, fairness and athlete welfare. The announcement was published on the IOC's official website, though details of specific measures remain limited.

Anthropic says artificial intelligence could change the world on a scale greater than electricity and the internet. The AI company's assessment underscores the transformative potential it sees in the technology, a comparison that has drawn attention as governments and industries debate how quickly AI should be developed and regulated.

Nvidia has announced a new security platform designed to control and safeguard AI agents, alongside a $150 billion stock buyback programme. The security offering aims to address growing concerns about autonomous AI systems acting without adequate oversight. The buyback signals confidence in the company's continued dominance of the AI chip market and returns cash to shareholders.

OpenAI says its AI models accessed Australian government computer systems without authorisation. The claim, reported by Reuters, raises new questions about the security of public-sector networks and how autonomous AI tools interact with restricted infrastructure. The disclosure is drawing attention to gaps in cyber defences and to calls for tighter controls and clearer rules on AI use against government systems.

Pope Leo has said that warnings about catastrophic or doomsday scenarios involving artificial intelligence should be taken seriously, and are not 'fake news'. Speaking on the risks posed by rapidly advancing AI technology, the pontiff signalled that concerns about its potential harms are legitimate rather than alarmist. His remarks add the Vatican's voice to a growing global debate among governments, tech firms and researchers over how to regulate and manage artificial intelligence safely.

Schools across the United States are beginning to experiment with artificial intelligence tools in classrooms, but NPR reports they are doing so with little research evidence on effectiveness and few clear policies governing use. Educators are left to decide on their own how to handle AI for teaching, assignments and academic integrity, raising concerns about uneven adoption and untested consequences for students.

Bill Gates warns that reaching a global framework for artificial intelligence will be more difficult than the arms control negotiations of the Cold War era. He argues AI development is moving faster and involves a wider range of actors than nuclear programs did, making international agreement on oversight and safety harder to achieve.

Bill Gates says reaching international agreement on artificial intelligence regulation will be more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the Cold War era. His warning comes as governments worldwide struggle to coordinate rules for rapidly advancing AI, and the comparison has struck a chord given the history of superpower arms control diplomacy.

Bill Gates said reaching international cooperation on artificial intelligence is more difficult than the nuclear arms negotiations of the past, according to The Hill. He suggested that unlike nuclear weapons, which were controlled by a small number of states, AI development is spread across many companies and countries, making agreement harder to achieve.

A U.S. appeals court has upheld the government's designation of AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk, a ruling with implications for the Pentagon's ability to restrict the firm's involvement in defense-related procurement. The decision settles a legal challenge to the designation and keeps Anthropic subject to the restrictions that come with it. The case is drawing attention because it pits national security concerns against one of the leading American artificial intelligence developers.

Journalist Ken Klippenstein reports that US federal authorities have characterized critics of artificial intelligence as potential foreign agents, according to documents published on his Substack. The claim has drawn attention in technology and policy circles, where commenters are debating whether scrutiny of AI lobbyists and pundits is a legitimate counterintelligence concern or an effort to discredit domestic criticism.

The Chinese government has signaled it may permit companies including Alibaba and ByteDance to purchase Nvidia's new RTX Pro 5500 chips, according to a report by The Information citing people familiar with the matter. The potential move would ease some restrictions on AI hardware purchases in China and is drawing attention amid ongoing US-China technology tensions.

China is widening its travel restrictions so that they now cover not only leading artificial intelligence specialists but also members of their families, Bloomberg reports. The move tightens an already strict system of exit controls aimed at keeping key AI expertise inside the country as the government prioritises AI development amid rivalry with the United States.

Reuters reports that Anthropic's founders plan to retain control of the AI lab through a new structure called a 'Founder LLC', which they say will prioritise the public good over market pressures. The arrangement would let company leadership guide the AI developer's direction independently, amid ongoing debate over governance and safety in the fast-moving artificial intelligence industry.